| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
SEATTLE |
|
|
173
| 83
Final
78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | DALLAS | -115 | | 604 | SEATTLE | -105 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(41-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(107-67 since 1997.) (61.5%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +39.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(76-32 since 1997.) (70.4%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog.
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(124-84 since 1997.) (59.6%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(85-49 since 1997.) (63.4%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(106-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(87-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(29-3 since 1997.) (90.6%, +25.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less.
(35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less.
(27-8 since 1997.) (77.1%, +19.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less.
(34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%) after 15 or more games.
(23-6 since 1997.) (79.3%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%).
(25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(55-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(62-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a road loss against a division rival, on Thursday nights.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +23.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +14 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(43-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(21-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (84%, +17.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(69-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(35-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(93-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(286-119 since 1997.) (70.6%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(297-293 since 1997.) (50.3%, +75.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(288-121 since 1997.) (70.4%, +74.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(270-107 since 1997.) (71.6%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(247-201 since 1997.) (55.1%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(280-261 since 1997.) (51.8%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(181-63 since 1997.) (74.2%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(151-49 since 1997.) (75.5%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(207-77 since 1997.) (72.9%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(148-50 since 1997.) (74.7%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(194-194 since 1997.) (50%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(170-64 since 1997.) (72.6%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(151-55 since 1997.) (73.3%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(110-27 since 1997.) (80.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(156-54 since 1997.) (74.3%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(137-72 since 1997.) (65.6%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(97-26 since 1997.) (78.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(153-107 since 1997.) (58.8%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(101-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(119-60 since 1997.) (66.5%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(107-67 since 1997.) (61.5%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(130-92 since 1997.) (58.6%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(79-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(69-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(85-27 since 1997.) (75.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(70-21 since 1997.) (76.9%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(71-19 since 1997.) (78.9%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(92-33 since 1997.) (73.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(106-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(45-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(58-31 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(58-31 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(54-36 since 1997.) (60%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(60-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-39 since 1997.) (62.9%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(59-38 since 1997.) (60.8%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(54-28 since 1997.) (65.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(53-19 since 1997.) (73.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(45-22 since 1997.) (67.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(61-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.5%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(35-14 since 1997.) (71.4%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better.
(32-8 since 1997.) (80%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(29-11 since 1997.) (72.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team, on Thursday nights.
(19-6 since 1997.) (76%, +15.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(35-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(66-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(35-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +14 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a road loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(24-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +32.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(46-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +33.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(43-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(69-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(36-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(29-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +15.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(40-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 80 | | 29-70 | 40.6% | 6-22 | 30.1% | 17-21 | 79.0% | 43 | 15 | 13 | | SEATTLE | 84 | | 30-62 | 48.5% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 18-22 | 83.3% | 41 | 9 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 589 times, while DALLAS won 384 times.
Edge against the money line=SEATTLE |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was DALLAS 90.0, OPPONENT 86.0 | SEATTLE is 7-33 against the money line (-24.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 85.1 |
|
DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 91.6 | SEATTLE is 79-42 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in home games in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 70.1 | SEATTLE is 8-4 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.7, OPPONENT 82.1 | SEATTLE is 40-19 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 70.3 | SEATTLE is 67-49 against the money line (+33.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 73.1 | SEATTLE is 61-30 against the money line (+24.8 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 69.5 | SEATTLE is 80-33 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 70.6 | SEATTLE is 147-116 against the money line (+37.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 70.5 | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.0, OPPONENT 80.3 | SEATTLE is 7-0 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 68.3 | SEATTLE is 58-23 against the money line (+28.3 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 68.4 | SEATTLE is 112-83 against the money line (+30.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 80.6 | SEATTLE is 11-8 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 82.1 | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 90.7, OPPONENT 84.7 | SEATTLE is 93-55 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 69.3 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 147-96 against the money line (+26.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 69-34 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 94-51 against the money line (+28.3 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 68-45 against the money line (+20.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 58-22 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 87-65 against the money line (+19.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 127-99 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 109-58 against the money line (+29.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 88-81 against the money line (+20.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 127-121 against the money line (+21.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 31-8 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 87-49 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 42-29 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 101-84 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 156-131 against the money line (+30.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 72-44 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 106-68 against the money line (+31.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 93-56 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 62-35 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 5-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was DALLAS 92.5, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 7-15 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 3-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 189-103 against the money line (+39.9 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 135-65 against the money line (+40.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 120-69 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 104-95 against the money line (+25.4 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 54-42 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 160-141 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ less shots than opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 17-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 97-44 against the money line (+26.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 23-9 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 93-50 against the money line (+23.3 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 64-31 against the money line (+28.8 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 71-50 against the money line (+40.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 78-55 against the money line (+31.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.9, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-9 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 78-42 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 88.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 102-89 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 42-16 against the money line (+23.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 28-9 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 21-5 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 38-12 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 70-28 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 54-17 against the money line (+24.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 39-12 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 25-5 against the money line (+18.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 85-33 against the money line (+24.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 39-9 against the money line (+23.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 22-6 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 146-138 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-9 | -2.2 | 7-9 | 14-2 | 86.6 | 42.7 | 41.4% | 44.6 | 88.2 | 43.3 | 47.7% | 42.0 | | Road Games | 3-4 | +1.7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 85.7 | 42.0 | 40.1% | 44.6 | 86.6 | 42.4 | 45.9% | 45.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.7 | 3-2 | 5-0 | 97.0 | 48.2 | 44.4% | 47.0 | 94.4 | 42.4 | 46.4% | 41.4 | | Division Games | 5-3 | +4.2 | 4-4 | 7-1 | 88.0 | 41.5 | 44.1% | 45.4 | 89.1 | 39.7 | 46.9% | 40.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.6 | 42.7 | 29-71 | 41.4% | 8-23 | 34.1% | 20-26 | 79.0% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.5 | 40.4 | 29-68 | 43.4% | 5-17 | 32.7% | 17-22 | 79.2% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.7 | 42.0 | 29-73 | 40.1% | 9-27 | 32.6% | 19-23 | 81.8% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 88.2 | 43.3 | 32-66 | 47.7% | 4-14 | 31.8% | 20-25 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 18-22 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.6 | 42.4 | 32-69 | 45.9% | 5-14 | 37.5% | 18-23 | 78.0% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 22 | 9 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-9 | +0.7 | 6-9 | 9-5 | 81.5 | 40.4 | 46.6% | 37.7 | 83.9 | 41.6 | 45.6% | 40.4 | | Home Games | 4-4 | 0 | 4-4 | 6-1 | 85.6 | 44.2 | 48.1% | 38.2 | 83.5 | 42.2 | 45.7% | 41.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 83.0 | 43.6 | 46.6% | 35.2 | 84.6 | 40.4 | 47.5% | 44.4 | | Division Games | 2-5 | +1.2 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 78.0 | 38.6 | 43.4% | 39.6 | 85.1 | 44.9 | 47.7% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.5 | 40.4 | 29-61 | 46.6% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 18-22 | 83.1% | 38 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 18-22 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.6 | 44.2 | 30-63 | 48.1% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 18-22 | 82.8% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.9 | 41.6 | 31-69 | 45.6% | 5-16 | 31.7% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 18-22 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.5 | 42.2 | 33-72 | 45.7% | 5-16 | 30.7% | 13-17 | 76.3% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.3, SEATTLE 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-77 | W | -950 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 53 | 13 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | | 5/27/2016 | ATLANTA | 93-102 | L | -200 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 48 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 44 | 12 | | 5/29/2016 | CHICAGO | 87-92 | L | +100 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | | 6/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-80 | L | +550 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | | 6/8/2016 | WASHINGTON | 79-87 | L | -175 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 43 | 10 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 52 | 15 | | 6/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 73-97 | L | +325 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | | 6/14/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 88-91 | L | +280 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | | 6/16/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-79 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | | 6/18/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 117-111 | W | +280 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 65 | 17 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 55 | 20 | | 6/21/2016 | PHOENIX | 100-90 | W | +135 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 39 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 36 | 13 | | 6/23/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-90 | W | -600 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 49 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | | 6/25/2016 | INDIANA | 87-92 | L | -250 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | | 6/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-89 | L | +400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 34 | 12 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | | 6/30/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/22/2016 | MINNESOTA | 71-78 | L | +350 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | | 5/26/2016 | WASHINGTON | 82-84 | L | -200 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | | 5/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-81 | W | -220 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | | 6/1/2016 | @ INDIANA | 75-85 | L | +210 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 27 | 20 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | | 6/3/2016 | PHOENIX | 95-81 | W | +200 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 43 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 32 | 12 | | 6/5/2016 | NEW YORK | 78-86 | L | +105 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 38 | 7 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 46 | 10 | | 6/10/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-77 | L | -155 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ INDIANA | 90-88 | W | +200 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 34 | 16 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 14 | | 6/14/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-77 | L | -175 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 50 | 13 | | 6/16/2016 | @ DALLAS | 79-88 | L | +180 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | MINNESOTA | 84-96 | L | +450 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | | 6/24/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 98-81 | W | -360 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 38 | 15 | 32-85 | 37.6% | 46 | 12 | | 6/28/2016 | ATLANTA | 84-81 | W | -220 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 33 | 12 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 45 | 12 | | 6/30/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| DALLAS is 20-21 (+5.2 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 6-3 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 8-10 (+3.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 3-1 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/16/2016 | SEATTLE | 79 | 166.5 | Over | 38 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 31 | 9 | 19 | | | DALLAS | 88 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 18-27 | 66.7% | 44 | 13 | 17 | 9/3/2015 | TULSA | 85 | 148 | SU ATS | 49 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 8 | 9 | | | SEATTLE | 67 | -3.5 | Over | 34 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 35 | 5 | 15 | 6/30/2015 | TULSA | 69 | -2.5 | Under | 40 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 43 | 8 | 10 | | | SEATTLE | 74 | 150.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 42 | 3 | 9 | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 89 | 150 | ATS | 42 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 30 | 6 | 9 | | | TULSA | 93 | -12 | SU Over | 45 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 26-28 | 92.9% | 43 | 11 | 13 | 6/9/2015 | SEATTLE | 45 | 161 | Under | 15 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 4-24 | 16.7% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 42 | 6 | 18 | | | TULSA | 68 | -6 | SU ATS | 40 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-27 | 59.3% | 58 | 13 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 18-13 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 29-16 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 3-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 74.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 7-15 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 3-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 5-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 4-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 7-11 against the money line (-14.0 Units) as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 71.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) as a road favorite of -245 or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 70.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 2-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-20 against the money line (-15.3 Units) off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-23 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-20 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 7-25 against the money line (-21.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 5-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 75.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 3-9 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-33 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-32 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-19 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 75.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-46 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-32 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 32-46 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 23-36 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 39-55 against the money line (-34.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-17 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 17-28 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 81.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-34 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 31-56 against the money line (-29.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-38 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 12-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 78.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 18-8 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 78.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 10-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 80.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 23-11 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 80.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 17-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 81.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 19-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 80.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 15-6 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 80.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 22-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 79.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 22 times, while the home underdog won straight up 8 times.
Edge against the money line=DALLAS | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:02:58 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|