| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
162.5
| 75
Final
84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | ATLANTA | +600 | | 602 | LOS ANGELES | -950 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(254-90 since 1997.) (73.8%, +85.7 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(326-132 since 1997.) (71.2%, +80.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(224-61 since 1997.) (78.6%, +76.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(307-117 since 1997.) (72.4%, +76 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(212-75 since 1997.) (73.9%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(176-59 since 1997.) (74.9%, +68.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(177-60 since 1997.) (74.7%, +65.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(190-68 since 1997.) (73.6%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(156-38 since 1997.) (80.4%, +63.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(199-138 since 1997.) (59.1%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(137-34 since 1997.) (80.1%, +61.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(137-39 since 1997.) (77.8%, +60.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(157-101 since 1997.) (60.9%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(90-23 since 1997.) (79.6%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(88-18 since 1997.) (83%, +46.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(126-54 since 1997.) (70%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(70-16 since 1997.) (81.4%, +44.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(106-44 since 1997.) (70.7%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(26-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +21.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(62-11 since 1997.) (84.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(188-65 since 1997.) (74.3%, +38.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(155-118 since 1997.) (56.8%, +38 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(65-13 since 1997.) (83.3%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(83-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +28.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(46-5 since 1997.) (90.2%, +35.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(119-52 since 1997.) (69.6%, +34 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(73-18 since 1997.) (80.2%, +33.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(21-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (84%, +18 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(78-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(79-29 since 1997.) (73.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(61-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(61-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(61-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less.
(35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(41-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +12.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +20 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(47-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(59-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(48-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(199-138 since 1997.) (59.1%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(157-101 since 1997.) (60.9%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(155-118 since 1997.) (56.8%, +38 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(60-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(28-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(44-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(38-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 75 | | 27-67 | 40.6% | 3-14 | 24.3% | 17-23 | 74.5% | 45 | 14 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | | 32-68 | 47.1% | 6-16 | 36.8% | 14-19 | 75.5% | 41 | 10 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 757 times, while ATLANTA won 222 times.
Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 18-16 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.5 | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-21.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 79.1 | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 72-72 against the money line (-38.1 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 159-144 against the money line (-73.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 17-23 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.4 | ATLANTA is 35-61 against the money line (-56.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.0 | ATLANTA is 6-16 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 83.0 | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.2 | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 | ATLANTA is 8-20 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 89.6 | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.4, OPPONENT 92.5 | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 86.2 | ATLANTA is 8-17 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.9 | ATLANTA is 96-111 against the money line (-55.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.8, OPPONENT 85.1 | ATLANTA is 10-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | LOS ANGELES is 64-15 against the money line (+32.7 Units) in home games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 70.7 | LOS ANGELES is 75-38 against the money line (+20.5 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 70.3 | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 76.0 | LOS ANGELES is 7-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 76.8 | LOS ANGELES is 21-3 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.3, OPPONENT 76.5 | LOS ANGELES is 16-1 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.3, OPPONENT 76.2 | LOS ANGELES is 21-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 73.1 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-48 against the money line (-36.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-21 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 107-90 against the money line (-47.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-21 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 46-33 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-22 against the money line (-19.4 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 25-34 against the money line (-21.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 38-45 against the money line (-24.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-31 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 29-46 against the money line (-28.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 76-86 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 30-33 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-19 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-16 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 81-90 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 31-33 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-16.9 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-21 against the money line (-20.5 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-18 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-28 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 66-81 against the money line (-44.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 25-30 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-49 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 22-20 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-19 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 51-42 against the money line (-37.4 Units) on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-24 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-17 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-21 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 43-42 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-28 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 67-72 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-19 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-16 against the money line (-16.1 Units) off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a road loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 26-31 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 16-26 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-24 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 105-114 against the money line (-46.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 74-91 against the money line (-48.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 21-32 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 64-83 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 64-89 against the money line (-60.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 33-49 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-32 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 41-8 against the money line (+28.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in June games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-26 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 72-22 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-49 against the money line (+29.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-7 | -0.4 | 7-8 | 8-6 | 83.0 | 39.9 | 41.8% | 46.7 | 85.7 | 41.9 | 43.0% | 47.6 | | Road Games | 4-4 | +1.1 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 80.4 | 36.6 | 42.6% | 47.1 | 82.2 | 41.6 | 41.9% | 45.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.4 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 79.0 | 39.6 | 41.3% | 44.0 | 87.8 | 43.0 | 45.7% | 46.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.0 | 39.9 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 4-14 | 24.7% | 22-29 | 74.3% | 47 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 5-17 | 33.1% | 18-23 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.4 | 36.6 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 3-14 | 25.2% | 20-28 | 72.1% | 47 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.7 | 41.9 | 31-73 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 18-23 | 77.8% | 48 | 10 | 20 | 24 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 32.7% | 17-21 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.2 | 41.6 | 30-71 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 31.1% | 18-23 | 76.9% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 10 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 14-1 | +11.2 | 9-6 | 8-7 | 85.9 | 41.6 | 48.7% | 38.5 | 72.7 | 35.6 | 42.5% | 41.8 | | Home Games | 7-1 | +3.4 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 84.6 | 41.5 | 49.0% | 36.9 | 73.6 | 37.1 | 43.6% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 81.8 | 37.4 | 45.8% | 39.0 | 75.2 | 40.2 | 44.2% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.9 | 41.6 | 32-66 | 48.7% | 6-16 | 39.3% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 38 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.3 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 18-23 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.6 | 41.5 | 32-66 | 49.0% | 6-15 | 37.1% | 14-19 | 75.8% | 37 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.7 | 35.6 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 4-16 | 26.6% | 13-18 | 74.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.6 | 37.1 | 28-64 | 43.6% | 4-16 | 25.2% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.8, LOS ANGELES 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/22/2016 | CHICAGO | 87-81 | W | +170 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | | 5/24/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 85-79 | W | +250 | 23-76 | 30.3% | 68 | 16 | 32-89 | 36.0% | 56 | 15 | | 5/27/2016 | @ DALLAS | 102-93 | W | +170 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 44 | 12 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 48 | 19 | | 5/29/2016 | INDIANA | 85-76 | W | -210 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 10 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 47 | 15 | | 6/3/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 83-77 | W | -330 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 47 | 16 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 50 | 18 | | 6/5/2016 | WASHINGTON | 79-86 | L | -500 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 8 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 49 | 7 | | 6/10/2016 | MINNESOTA | 78-110 | L | +250 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 47 | 18 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 37 | 10 | | 6/12/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-87 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | | 6/17/2016 | CHICAGO | 101-97 | W | +175 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | | 6/18/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 65-95 | L | +155 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 38 | 21 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 40 | 12 | | 6/22/2016 | NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +120 | 28-84 | 33.3% | 46 | 11 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 61 | 18 | | 6/25/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 69-73 | L | -210 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 41 | 13 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 49 | 10 | | 6/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-84 | L | +180 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 45 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 33 | 12 | | 6/30/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | W | -120 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 93-80 | W | -155 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-72 | W | -650 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 68-61 | W | | 23-53 | 43.4% | 39 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 13 | | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-61 | W | -550 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 36 | 8 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 8 | | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | 100-77 | W | -330 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | | 6/11/2016 | @ DALLAS | 97-73 | W | -450 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 98-85 | W | -360 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | | 6/17/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-71 | W | -550 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 15 | | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-72 | L | -155 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | | 6/24/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-76 | W | +180 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 38 | 18 | | 6/26/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 80-73 | W | | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | | 6/28/2016 | DALLAS | 89-84 | W | -600 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 34 | 12 | | 6/30/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 10-5 (+6.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 3-1 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| ATLANTA is 4-3 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 1-1 (+0.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 157.5 | Under | 25 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 43 | 8 | 14 | | | ATLANTA | 90 | -4 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 59 | 19 | 16 | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 76 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 42 | 11 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -2.5 | Under | 35 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 38 | 7 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Cooper is 23-9 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 74.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 101-72 against the money line (+20.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 75.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-11 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 46-48 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 3-8 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus terrible 3 point shooting teams -making <=27% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 60.6, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Cooper is 43-42 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 15-14 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in June games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 32-27 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 11-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 9-17 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 1-7 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 3-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 10-14 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 1-5 against the money line (-7.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 26-31 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 16-26 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 13-24 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 31-29 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 8-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 16-24 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Cooper is 5-11 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 19-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 17-21 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 30-33 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 12-19 against the money line (-11.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 12-19 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 24-26 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 17-22 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 31-33 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 16-20 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 25-30 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 101-51 against the money line (+25.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 40-12 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 81.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 41-19 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in home games in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.5, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 30-19 against the money line (+15.7 Units) on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 102-73 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-9 against the money line (+16.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 76-54 against the money line (+30.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 23-10 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 36-17 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 47-19 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 36-10 against the money line (+20.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 80.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 52-26 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 31-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 68-43 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 20-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 18-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-3 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in home games after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 80.0, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 97-77 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 146-119 against the money line (+38.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 148-107 against the money line (+31.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 64-36 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 97-50 against the money line (+47.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 58-32 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 83-42 against the money line (+30.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 44-22 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-7 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 29 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 06/29/2016 - Tiffany Hayes missed last game, "?" Thursday vs. LA Sparks ( Hamstring ) | | [F] 06/28/2016 - Sancho Lyttle "?" Thursday vs. LA Sparks ( Hamstring ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 10:04:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|