| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
CHICAGO |
|
|
173.5
| 66
Final
70 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 3 - LA leads 2-0 | | |  | |
| 661 | LOS ANGELES | -270 | | 662 | CHICAGO | +210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(146-106 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(91-57 since 1997.) (61.5%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(62-30 since 1997.) (67.4%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(52-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(83-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +25.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(106-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +29.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(128-102 since 1997.) (55.7%, +19.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(56-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(89-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +15.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(89-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +15.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(89-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +15.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(27-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +13 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(93-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(87-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(87-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(87-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(128-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(51-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.7%, +9.9 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(214-63 since 1997.) (77.3%, +100.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(190-40 since 1997.) (82.6%, +93.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(277-96 since 1997.) (74.3%, +85.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(332-134 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(246-66 since 1997.) (78.8%, +76.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(335-127 since 1997.) (72.5%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(189-63 since 1997.) (75%, +70 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(230-80 since 1997.) (74.2%, +69.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(327-330 since 1997.) (49.8%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(132-35 since 1997.) (79%, +69.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(193-68 since 1997.) (73.9%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(118-21 since 1997.) (84.9%, +66.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(155-43 since 1997.) (78.3%, +66.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(168-41 since 1997.) (80.4%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(77-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(203-142 since 1997.) (58.8%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(157-41 since 1997.) (79.3%, +60.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(109-26 since 1997.) (80.7%, +60.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(161-105 since 1997.) (60.5%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(304-132 since 1997.) (69.7%, +58.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(154-51 since 1997.) (75.1%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(87-18 since 1997.) (82.9%, +53.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(101-26 since 1997.) (79.5%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(101-22 since 1997.) (82.1%, +53.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(125-37 since 1997.) (77.2%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(303-135 since 1997.) (69.2%, +52.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(106-27 since 1997.) (79.7%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(110-34 since 1997.) (76.4%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(285-121 since 1997.) (70.2%, +52.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(106-22 since 1997.) (82.8%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(85-14 since 1997.) (85.9%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(134-56 since 1997.) (70.5%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(103-37 since 1997.) (73.6%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(59-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(100-41 since 1997.) (70.9%, +47.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(90-23 since 1997.) (79.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(113-46 since 1997.) (71.1%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(306-298 since 1997.) (50.7%, +46.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(114-60 since 1997.) (65.5%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(93-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(85-21 since 1997.) (80.2%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(85-62 since 1997.) (57.8%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(80-16 since 1997.) (83.3%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(79-20 since 1997.) (79.8%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(103-70 since 1997.) (59.5%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(77-16 since 1997.) (82.8%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(63-10 since 1997.) (86.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(169-64 since 1997.) (72.5%, +38.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(204-72 since 1997.) (73.9%, +38.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(157-61 since 1997.) (72%, +38 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(49-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(62-40 since 1997.) (60.8%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(212-224 since 1997.) (48.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(60-12 since 1997.) (83.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(61-10 since 1997.) (85.9%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(122-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(161-56 since 1997.) (74.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(162-67 since 1997.) (70.7%, +35.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(98-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(63-23 since 1997.) (73.3%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(96-36 since 1997.) (72.7%, +34 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(187-77 since 1997.) (70.8%, +33.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(65-20 since 1997.) (76.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(105-68 since 1997.) (60.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(85-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.7%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(77-37 since 1997.) (67.5%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(45-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +15.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(62-36 since 1997.) (63.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(42-7 since 1997.) (85.7%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(60-14 since 1997.) (81.1%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(51-25 since 1997.) (67.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(49-27 since 1997.) (64.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(45-16 since 1997.) (73.8%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(37-6 since 1997.) (86%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(43-10 since 1997.) (81.1%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(78-34 since 1997.) (69.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(94-30 since 1997.) (75.8%, +27.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(69-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(124-64 since 1997.) (66%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%).
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(59-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(38-19 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(37-22 since 1997.) (62.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(35-19 since 1997.) (64.8%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(65-24 since 1997.) (73%, +21.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(128-102 since 1997.) (55.7%, +19.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(53-32 since 1997.) (62.4%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +18.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(55-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(103-43 since 1997.) (70.5%, +15.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(38-18 since 1997.) (67.9%, +15.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(23-13 since 1997.) (63.9%, +15 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(89-37 since 1997.) (70.6%, +14.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(39-21 since 1997.) (65%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(76-29 since 1997.) (72.4%, +13.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +11.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(61-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(84-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(79-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.1%, +7.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(40-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, -1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(42-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +14.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(42-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +20.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games.
(38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +2.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(27-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(47-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +16.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(47-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +11.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +8.1 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 84 | | 32-65 | 49.1% | 6-16 | 39.3% | 14-17 | 79.9% | 39 | 8 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 85 | | 34-73 | 45.8% | 4-11 | 35.8% | 14-17 | 83.2% | 43 | 13 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 529 times, while LOS ANGELES won 443 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 19-2 against the money line (+16.1 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.9, OPPONENT 76.8 | LOS ANGELES is 82-50 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 91.3, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 18-0 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 93.7, OPPONENT 79.1 | CHICAGO is 102-140 against the money line (-65.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 80.0 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-6.7 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 95.9 | CHICAGO is 48-73 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 53-75 against the money line (-30.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 | CHICAGO is 11-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 91.0 | CHICAGO is 9-15 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 92.9 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 28-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | LOS ANGELES is 45-71 against the money line (-76.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 61-57 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 132-111 against the money line (-54.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 15-16 against the money line (-22.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 84.6 | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 88.4 | LOS ANGELES is 20-21 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.6 | LOS ANGELES is 105-105 against the money line (-60.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 70-72 against the money line (-38.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 169-149 against the money line (-80.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 82.2 | LOS ANGELES is 11-14 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.2 | CHICAGO is 57-36 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.1, OPPONENT 86.2 | CHICAGO is 13-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 77.7 | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.9, OPPONENT 81.9 | CHICAGO is 22-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.3, OPPONENT 83.2 | CHICAGO is 32-10 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 92.3, OPPONENT 84.9 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 53-85 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 78-127 against the money line (-65.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-56 against the money line (-39.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 52-86 against the money line (-45.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 74-120 against the money line (-66.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 76-120 against the money line (-55.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 53-47 against the money line (-29.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 131-171 against the money line (-58.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-28 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 106-151 against the money line (-50.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 48-67 against the money line (-33.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 182-167 against the money line (-60.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 129-115 against the money line (-49.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-27 against the money line (-27.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-33 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 43-42 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 120-97 against the money line (-54.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 172-141 against the money line (-73.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-17 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-27 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 92.8, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 92.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-6 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) off a home win this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-51 against the money line (+30.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 88-34 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-29 against the money line (-16.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 58-82 against the money line (-34.5 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 108-134 against the money line (-49.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-33 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-34 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-29 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-55 against the money line (-28.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-43 against the money line (-21.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-29 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 89-134 against the money line (-62.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 68-102 against the money line (-47.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 96-131 against the money line (-52.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 62-86 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-34 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-50 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 58-77 against the money line (-37.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-52 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 83-103 against the money line (-38.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 60-77 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-58 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-33 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-30 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-26 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-29 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-29 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-34 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-26 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-23 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-32 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 85-115 against the money line (-40.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-50 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 132-117 against the money line (-54.9 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-30 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-25 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-32 against the money line (-25.8 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-31 against the money line (-31.0 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 175 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 28-8 | +4.5 | 17-19 | 20-16 | 83.7 | 40.8 | 49.0% | 38.6 | 76.1 | 37.8 | 43.1% | 39.9 | | Road Games | 12-5 | -2.3 | 9-8 | 9-8 | 81.9 | 39.5 | 47.7% | 40.2 | 75.6 | 37.9 | 42.4% | 40.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 83.0 | 42.2 | 48.6% | 38.0 | 77.4 | 39.4 | 42.5% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.7 | 40.8 | 31-64 | 49.0% | 6-16 | 37.6% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 39 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-16 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.9 | 39.5 | 31-64 | 47.7% | 6-16 | 39.1% | 14-18 | 80.3% | 40 | 6 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 14-17 | 78.3% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.6 | 37.9 | 29-67 | 42.4% | 5-18 | 30.0% | 13-17 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 19-18 | -5.8 | 17-19 | 26-11 | 86.4 | 44.3 | 46.1% | 43.6 | 86.5 | 43.0 | 44.1% | 42.0 | | Home Games | 12-6 | +3 | 8-10 | 13-5 | 89.1 | 44.3 | 47.3% | 44.4 | 84.6 | 42.3 | 43.3% | 41.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 86.8 | 43.4 | 46.2% | 43.0 | 89.6 | 47.0 | 46.7% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.4 | 44.3 | 33-72 | 46.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 16-19 | 83.0% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 89.1 | 44.3 | 35-73 | 47.3% | 4-11 | 35.3% | 16-20 | 82.0% | 44 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.5 | 43.0 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 19-23 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 17-21 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.6 | 42.3 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 19-24 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.3, CHICAGO 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 72-79 | L | -450 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 12 | | 8/28/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 66-70 | L | -165 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 40 | 16 | | 9/1/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-61 | W | | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 14 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 36 | 12 | | 9/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | 87-79 | W | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 10 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 45 | 11 | | 9/4/2016 | INDIANA | 88-81 | W | -400 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 38 | 9 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 30 | 8 | | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 74-77 | L | -110 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 37 | 8 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | | 9/8/2016 | ATLANTA | 81-86 | L | -450 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 47 | 12 | | 9/11/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 60-78 | L | -140 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 27 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | | 9/13/2016 | PHOENIX | 90-85 | W | -155 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 4 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 11 | | 9/16/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-65 | W | -650 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 36 | 22 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 27 | 14 | | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 95-75 | W | -650 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | | 9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | 99-84 | W | -850 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 44 | 18 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 44 | 14 | | 10/2/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 90-82 | W | -210 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 50 | 7 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 12 | | 8/28/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-85 | W | +105 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 42 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | | 9/2/2016 | SEATTLE | 92-88 | W | -330 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 45 | 5 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 45 | 8 | | 9/4/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-73 | W | -750 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 46 | 9 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 32 | 8 | | 9/7/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-118 | L | -165 | 32-84 | 38.1% | 40 | 9 | 45-74 | 60.8% | 47 | 9 | | 9/9/2016 | @ INDIANA | 88-95 | L | +220 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 40 | 11 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 45 | 17 | | 9/11/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-86 | W | +145 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 46 | 12 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 47 | 12 | | 9/13/2016 | MINNESOTA | 98-97 | W | +180 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 17 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 15 | | 9/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 92-68 | W | -200 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 51 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 18 | | 9/18/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 75-88 | L | +200 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 36 | 16 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 43 | 12 | | 9/25/2016 | ATLANTA | 108-98 | W | -125 | 44-80 | 55.0% | 47 | 11 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 47 | 12 | | 9/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-95 | L | +450 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | | 9/30/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-99 | L | +550 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 44 | 14 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 44 | 18 | | 10/2/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 18-6 (+10.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 8-1 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 8-4 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 4-0 (+5.2 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | 84 | 169 | Over | 42 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 44 | 14 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 99 | -12 | SU ATS | 57 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 7 | 18 | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 75 | 167.5 | Over | 35 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 37 | 11 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -11 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 44 | 2 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 67 | 169 | Under | 35 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 32 | 10 | 5 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 85 | 168.5 | Over | 37 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 36 | 11 | 9 | | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 46 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 31 | 7 | 6 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 37 | 6 | 8 | | | CHICAGO | 80 | 165.5 | Over | 35 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 64 | 162 | Under | 35 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 49 | 14 | 9 | | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 41 | 4 | 11 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 88 | 163 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 42 | 7 | 6 | | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | Over | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 11-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 49-35 against the money line (+20.0 Units) on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 89-65 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 43-27 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 68-55 against the money line (+17.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 132-94 against the money line (+41.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-6 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 23-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 44-26 against the money line (+19.2 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-3 against the money line (+6.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 30-18 against the money line (+15.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 71-36 against the money line (+30.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 25-9 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 36-17 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 58-29 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 20-10 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 22-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 34-12 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 159-126 against the money line (+31.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 161-114 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 77-42 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 110-56 against the money line (+42.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 108-87 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 9-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 110-108 against the money line (-28.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-47 against the money line (-27.2 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 36-44 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 69-77 against the money line (-37.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-16 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-47 against the money line (-27.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 55-57 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-45 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 8-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-60 against the money line (-22.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-53 against the money line (-22.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 14-22 against the money line (-15.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-33 against the money line (-16.6 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 60-68 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-54 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 64-68 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-44 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 27-29 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-52 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-27 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-30 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 21-25 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 5-11 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 2-13 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Chatman is 44-53 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-62 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-37 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 31-35 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-48 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-36 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-53 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-47 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 45-65 against the money line (-36.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 5-20 against the money line (-18.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 10-29 against the money line (-24.4 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 31-43 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-59 against the money line (-38.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-34 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 87-90 against the money line (-28.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 39-49 against the money line (-19.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 50-70 against the money line (-41.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 64-65 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-65 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 83-92 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-29 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-35 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 67-78 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 43-64 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-43 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-56 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 2-6 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 16-23 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-13 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 6-13 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in road games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 23-42 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 7-12 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 3-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-8 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-9 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 2-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 7-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 6-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 39-17 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-21 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 21-13 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 30 times, while the home underdog won straight up 20 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 09/14/2016 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/29/2024 8:37:53 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|