| | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES First Half Results CHICAGO |
|
| 86 | 39 Final 30 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 3 - LA leads 2-0 | | | | |
661 | LOS ANGELES | -3.5 | 662 | CHICAGO | 85.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after trailing their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (125-69 since 1997.) (64.4%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (94-52 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins. (78-43 since 1997.) (64.5%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite. (133-83 since 1997.) (61.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins. (144-94 since 1997.) (60.5%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (123-64 since 1997.) (65.8%, +52.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (127-80 since 1997.) (61.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (98-50 since 1997.) (66.2%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (86-47 since 1997.) (64.7%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (69-35 since 1997.) (66.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (67-35 since 1997.) (65.7%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite. (45-19 since 1997.) (70.3%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (213-149 since 1997.) (58.8%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (99-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +28.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (50-18 since 1997.) (73.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more. (48-20 since 1997.) (70.6%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (77-37 since 1997.) (67.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (81-48 since 1997.) (62.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (135-87 since 1997.) (60.8%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (176-114 since 1997.) (60.7%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (99-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (70-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (160-110 since 1997.) (59.3%, +39 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (123-86 since 1997.) (58.9%, +28.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (121-83 since 1997.) (59.3%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more. (206-153 since 1997.) (57.4%, +37.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (156-106 since 1997.) (59.5%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (116-80 since 1997.) (59.2%, +28 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (32-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (106-69 since 1997.) (60.6%, +30.1 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (76-48 since 1997.) (61.3%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (75-55 since 1997.) (57.7%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (527-393 since 1997.) (57.3%, +94.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (400-285 since 1997.) (58.4%, +86.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent. (873-657 since 1997.) (57.1%, +150.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more. (453-331 since 1997.) (57.8%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (636-465 since 1997.) (57.8%, +124.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (165-105 since 1997.) (61.1%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season. (243-161 since 1997.) (60.1%, +65.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (44-21 since 1997.) (67.7%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins. (890-685 since 1997.) (56.5%, +136.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season. (509-381 since 1997.) (57.2%, +89.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a non-conference game. (693-549 since 1997.) (55.8%, +89.1 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (527-393 since 1997.) (57.3%, +94.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (400-285 since 1997.) (58.4%, +86.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (331-237 since 1997.) (58.3%, +70.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (219-154 since 1997.) (58.7%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent. (687-505 since 1997.) (57.6%, +131.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (270-189 since 1997.) (58.8%, +62.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more. (374-270 since 1997.) (58.1%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a win by 10 points or more. (445-329 since 1997.) (57.5%, +83.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread. (856-653 since 1997.) (56.7%, +137.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season. (425-304 since 1997.) (58.3%, +90.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (288-198 since 1997.) (59.3%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 84 | | 42 | | 32-65 | 49.1% | 6-16 | 39.3% | 14-17 | 79.9% | 39 | 8 | 14 | CHICAGO | 85 | | 43 | | 34-73 | 45.8% | 4-11 | 35.8% | 14-17 | 83.2% | 43 | 13 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 656 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 344 times. Edge against first half line=CHICAGO | In 1000 simulated games, 553 games went under first half total, while 447 games went over first half total. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 27-14 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 37.7 | LOS ANGELES is 192-103 against the 1rst half line (+78.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.3, OPPONENT 37.0 | LOS ANGELES is 134-51 against the 1rst half line (+77.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.4, OPPONENT 37.7 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 48.1 | CHICAGO is 79-112 against the 1rst half line (-44.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 42.8 | CHICAGO is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 45.1 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 46-69 against the 1rst half line (-29.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 39.2 | LOS ANGELES is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 41.3 | LOS ANGELES is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.9, OPPONENT 44.1 | CHICAGO is 112-62 against the 1rst half line (+43.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 39.3 | CHICAGO is 75-38 against the 1rst half line (+33.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 39.9 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 126-92 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 35.6 | LOS ANGELES is 211-164 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.1 |
|
| | | | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-35 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts this season. The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 48.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 57-83 against the 1rst half line (-34.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-33 against the 1rst half line (-17.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 48.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 47.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 39-23 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.0, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.0, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-19 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 126-94 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-101 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-45 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 81-53 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 112-75 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 217-171 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 130-97 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 141-95 UNDER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 188-147 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 44.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) off a road loss this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 48.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 56-83 against the 1rst half line (-35.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-63 against the 1rst half line (-29.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-37 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-34 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 33.6, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-44 against the 1rst half line (-28.4 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 55-83 against the 1rst half line (-36.3 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-61 against the 1rst half line (-31.1 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-23 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 31.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 82-111 against the 1rst half line (-40.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 23-14 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-20 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-20 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-18 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 31-14 OVER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-5 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 28-14 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.1, OPPONENT 48.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 46.4, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 46.2, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 47.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-17 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-11 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 46.2, OPPONENT 46.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.5, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.0, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.5, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 46.6, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.5, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.8, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 21-12 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 45.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-6 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.6, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-6 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 45.0, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 30-15 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 45.2, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-21 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 35-18 OVER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 58-34 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 387-324 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 264-218 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 203-152 UNDER (+35.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 174-126 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.5, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 137-105 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 193-144 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 47-23 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 126-96 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 76-52 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 146-109 UNDER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 43-23 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-12 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-7 UNDER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 187-139 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 49-31 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-82 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-90 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 207-166 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 66-43 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 150-114 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 259-211 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-64 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 80-51 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 121-90 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 53-30 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 53-34 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 28-8 | +4.5 | 17-19 | 20-16 | 83.7 | 40.8 | 49.0% | 38.6 | 76.1 | 37.8 | 43.1% | 39.9 | Road Games | 12-5 | -2.3 | 9-8 | 9-8 | 81.9 | 39.5 | 47.7% | 40.2 | 75.6 | 37.9 | 42.4% | 40.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 83.0 | 42.2 | 48.6% | 38.0 | 77.4 | 39.4 | 42.5% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.7 | 40.8 | 31-64 | 49.0% | 6-16 | 37.6% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 39 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 83 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-16 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.9 | 39.5 | 31-64 | 47.7% | 6-16 | 39.1% | 14-18 | 80.3% | 40 | 6 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 14-17 | 78.3% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.6 | 37.9 | 29-67 | 42.4% | 5-18 | 30.0% | 13-17 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-18 | -5.8 | 17-19 | 26-11 | 86.4 | 44.3 | 46.1% | 43.6 | 86.5 | 43.0 | 44.1% | 42.0 | Home Games | 12-6 | +3 | 8-10 | 13-5 | 89.1 | 44.3 | 47.3% | 44.4 | 84.6 | 42.3 | 43.3% | 41.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 86.8 | 43.4 | 46.2% | 43.0 | 89.6 | 47.0 | 46.7% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.4 | 44.3 | 33-72 | 46.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 16-19 | 83.0% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 89.1 | 44.3 | 35-73 | 47.3% | 4-11 | 35.3% | 16-20 | 82.0% | 44 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.5 | 43.0 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 19-23 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 17-21 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.6 | 42.3 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 19-24 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.3, CHICAGO 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
8/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 72-79 | 28-31 | -5 | L | 80 | U | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 12 | 8/28/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 66-70 | 30-32 | -2 | L | 82 | U | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 40 | 16 | 9/1/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-61 | 34-36 | -8 | L | 75 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 14 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 36 | 12 | 9/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | 87-79 | 43-41 | -3.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 10 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 45 | 11 | 9/4/2016 | INDIANA | 88-81 | 46-41 | -5 | T | 79 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 38 | 9 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 30 | 8 | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 74-77 | 37-42 | 0 | L | 78.5 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 37 | 8 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 9/8/2016 | ATLANTA | 81-86 | 36-41 | -5 | L | 80.5 | U | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 47 | 12 | 9/11/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 60-78 | 27-49 | -1.5 | L | 79 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 27 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | 9/13/2016 | PHOENIX | 90-85 | 39-47 | -1.5 | L | 80 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 4 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 11 | 9/16/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-65 | 36-24 | -6.5 | W | 75 | U | 27-54 | 50.0% | 36 | 22 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 27 | 14 | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 95-75 | 52-35 | -6.5 | W | 83 | O | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | 99-84 | 57-42 | -7 | W | 83.5 | O | 36-67 | 53.7% | 44 | 18 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 44 | 14 | 10/2/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 90-82 | 44-44 | -2.5 | L | 82.5 | O | 32-79 | 40.5% | 50 | 7 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 12 | 8/28/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-85 | 50-37 | 1 | W | 85 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 42 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 9/2/2016 | SEATTLE | 92-88 | 55-43 | -4 | W | 81.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 45 | 5 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 45 | 8 | 9/4/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-73 | 51-47 | -6.5 | L | 79 | O | 34-65 | 52.3% | 46 | 9 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 32 | 8 | 9/7/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-118 | 39-56 | -2 | L | 83.5 | O | 32-84 | 38.1% | 40 | 9 | 45-74 | 60.8% | 47 | 9 | 9/9/2016 | @ INDIANA | 88-95 | 44-52 | 3.5 | L | 82.5 | O | 31-73 | 42.5% | 40 | 11 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 45 | 17 | 9/11/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-86 | 43-47 | 2 | L | 85 | O | 33-66 | 50.0% | 46 | 12 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 47 | 12 | 9/13/2016 | MINNESOTA | 98-97 | 41-39 | 3 | W | 84 | U | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 17 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 15 | 9/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 92-68 | 50-37 | -2.5 | W | 85 | O | 39-83 | 47.0% | 51 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 18 | 9/18/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 75-88 | 34-39 | 3 | L | 84 | U | 33-68 | 48.5% | 36 | 16 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 43 | 12 | 9/25/2016 | ATLANTA | 108-98 | 56-50 | -1 | W | 85 | O | 44-80 | 55.0% | 47 | 11 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 47 | 12 | 9/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-95 | 35-52 | 6.5 | L | 83 | O | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | 9/30/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-99 | 42-57 | 7 | L | 83.5 | O | 30-78 | 38.5% | 44 | 14 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 44 | 18 | 10/2/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 17-8 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | 13 of 24 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-1 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | 6 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-0 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | 84 | 169 | Over | 42 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 44 | 14 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 99 | -12 | SU ATS | 57 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 7 | 18 | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 75 | 167.5 | Over | 35 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 37 | 11 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -11 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 44 | 2 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 67 | 169 | Under | 35 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 32 | 10 | 5 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 85 | 168.5 | Over | 37 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 36 | 11 | 9 | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 46 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 31 | 7 | 6 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 37 | 6 | 8 | | CHICAGO | 80 | 165.5 | Over | 35 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 64 | 162 | Under | 35 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 49 | 14 | 9 | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 41 | 4 | 11 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 88 | 163 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 42 | 7 | 6 | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | Over | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 62-41 against the 1rst half line (+16.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 38.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 97-120 against the 1rst half line (-35.0 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 39-67 against the 1rst half line (-34.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 38-67 against the 1rst half line (-35.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 33-46 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 63-81 against the 1rst half line (-26.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 10-26 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-66 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 51-64 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-54 against the 1rst half line (-26.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-41 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-66 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-56 against the 1rst half line (-21.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-47 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 26-40 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-42 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-74 against the 1rst half line (-28.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 41-55 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-78 against the 1rst half line (-29.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-54 against the 1rst half line (-26.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 8-22 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-31 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-49 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-34 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-72 against the 1rst half line (-26.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-62 against the 1rst half line (-31.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-48 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 39-52 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-75 against the 1rst half line (-26.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 36-50 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-36 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-56 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-67 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 35-51 against the 1rst half line (-21.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-44 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 39-67 against the 1rst half line (-34.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-33 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-59 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 39-57 against the 1rst half line (-23.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-37 against the 1rst half line (-16.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-44 against the 1rst half line (-18.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 47-62 against the 1rst half line (-21.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-43 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 47-70 against the 1rst half line (-30.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 77-98 against the 1rst half line (-30.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 52-65 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 34-56 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 52-77 against the 1rst half line (-32.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 47-72 against the 1rst half line (-32.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 74-100 against the 1rst half line (-36.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-29 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-37 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-62 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-49 against the 1rst half line (-25.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 42-56 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 25-39 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-41 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-44 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-55 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-26 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 32.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 44-74 against the 1rst half line (-37.4 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 32.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-44 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-29 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 125-94 OVER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-31 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 87-59 OVER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 73-47 OVER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 40-26 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 70-45 OVER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 52-36 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-48 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 57-38 OVER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 76-52 OVER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-34 OVER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 50-29 OVER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 76-58 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 50-37 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 35-21 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 59-40 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-31 OVER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 41-15 OVER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 30-9 OVER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 78-48 OVER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 65-35 OVER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 53-26 OVER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 42-20 OVER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 53-38 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 79-55 OVER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 56-32 OVER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 40-20 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-12 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 25-8 OVER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 61-38 OVER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-11 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 74-44 OVER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 44-25 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-14 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 63-47 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 59-40 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 45-31 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 66-44 OVER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-44 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 68-51 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 100-77 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 50-38 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 68-53 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 52-39 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 75-55 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 69-52 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 101-75 OVER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-26 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 55-38 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 64-48 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 90-72 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-43 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 85-60 OVER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 62-45 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-32 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 59-42 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 274-160 UNDER (+98.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 142-90 UNDER (+43.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 141-74 UNDER (+59.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 98-61 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 100-59 UNDER (+35.1 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 99-58 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 134-93 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 78-38 UNDER (+36.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 51-31 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 42-24 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 27-13 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 100-59 UNDER (+35.1 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 128-60 UNDER (+62.0 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 52-21 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 98-51 UNDER (+41.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 57-20 UNDER (+35.0 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 80-45 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 107-60 UNDER (+41.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 41-23 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 63-32 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 37-17 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 30.0, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 42-24 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 88-62 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 62-40 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 109-70 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 55-35 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 73-48 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 80-44 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 145-86 UNDER (+50.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 80-54 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 107-66 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 50-20 UNDER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 131-83 UNDER (+39.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 71-35 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 128-75 UNDER (+45.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 136-94 UNDER (+32.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 49-29 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 121-72 UNDER (+41.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 66-45 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 42-22 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 33.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 125-85 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 93-64 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 113-84 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 169-118 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 125-85 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 93-61 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 142-88 UNDER (+45.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 137-85 UNDER (+43.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 72-46 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 103-75 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 57-34 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 167-109 UNDER (+47.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 99-71 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 109-78 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 158-106 UNDER (+41.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 112-80 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 91-62 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 27 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 22 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 7 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 3 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 5 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. Edge against the first half total=Over | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| | | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 09/14/2016 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/29/2024 8:10:38 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|