Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Friday 7/1/2016Line$ LineOU LineScore
WASHINGTON
 
CHICAGO
+4  

-4  
+155

-175

167
 		84
Final
86

Go to Top
WASHINGTON (9 - 8) at CHICAGO (6 - 9)
View Previous GameView Next Game
Friday, 7/1/2016 8:30 PM
Go to Top
Board Money Line
653WASHINGTON+155
654CHICAGO-175
BETTING TRENDSGo to Top

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)

 (0%)

OVER

 (0%)
(Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™Go to Top
StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line
There are 56 situations with a total rating of 124 stars.
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(248-201 since 1997.) (55.2%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(151-49 since 1997.) (75.5%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(207-77 since 1997.) (72.9%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(200-72 since 1997.) (73.5%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(132-31 since 1997.) (81%, +59 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(178-65 since 1997.) (73.3%, +58 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(136-42 since 1997.) (76.4%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(156-55 since 1997.) (73.9%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(159-72 since 1997.) (68.8%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(141-48 since 1997.) (74.6%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(194-124 since 1997.) (61%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(158-56 since 1997.) (73.8%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(126-40 since 1997.) (75.9%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(150-73 since 1997.) (67.3%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(119-41 since 1997.) (74.4%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(235-98 since 1997.) (70.6%, +45.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(120-42 since 1997.) (74.1%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(97-33 since 1997.) (74.6%, +44 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(91-30 since 1997.) (75.2%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(106-38 since 1997.) (73.6%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(93-29 since 1997.) (76.2%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(88-28 since 1997.) (75.9%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(76-46 since 1997.) (62.3%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(58-10 since 1997.) (85.3%, +39.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(85-27 since 1997.) (75.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(96-70 since 1997.) (57.8%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(61-13 since 1997.) (82.4%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(124-85 since 1997.) (59.3%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(47-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(107-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +31.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +31 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(48-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(55-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(87-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +30.1 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +14 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a double digit loss as a favorite of 6 points or more against opponent off a home win.
(25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +17 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(62-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(35-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(75-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(46-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +5.6 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(31-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(70-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(93-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring WASHINGTON against the money line
There are 33 situations with a total rating of 81 stars.
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(298-293 since 1997.) (50.4%, +76.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(281-261 since 1997.) (51.8%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(195-194 since 1997.) (50.1%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(161-144 since 1997.) (52.8%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(112-83 since 1997.) (57.4%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(68-28 since 1997.) (70.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(76-33 since 1997.) (69.7%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(76-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +33 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(79-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(24-12 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.7 units. Rating = 5*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(67-36 since 1997.) (65%, +32 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(59-31 since 1997.) (65.6%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(37-15 since 1997.) (71.2%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(62-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(62-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(62-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(50-26 since 1997.) (65.8%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(47-28 since 1997.) (62.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(22-13 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(62-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(23-10 since 1997.) (69.7%, +20 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +15.3 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(34-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™Go to Top
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
WASHINGTON80 28-6742.2%7-1937.4%17-2179.4%411012
CHICAGO84 33-7246.3%4-1234.9%14-1782.7%451211

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 602 times, while WASHINGTON won 364 times.
No Edge.
Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to win against the money line
WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 72.5
WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6
WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.3, OPPONENT 79.4
CHICAGO is 89-131 against the money line (-69.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.2
CHICAGO is 29-47 against the money line (-31.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.9
CHICAGO is 43-71 against the money line (-34.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.8
CHICAGO is 20-48 against the money line (-32.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.3
CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 89.2
CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 86.8
CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
WASHINGTON is 9-18 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 78.1
WASHINGTON is 32-95 against the money line (-68.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 77.8
WASHINGTON is 130-201 against the money line (-70.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.2
WASHINGTON is 8-28 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 85.7
WASHINGTON is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 92.0
WASHINGTON is 69-147 against the money line (-73.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 75.9
WASHINGTON is 35-101 against the money line (-76.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 74.8
CHICAGO is 53-35 against the money line (+16.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 78.4
CHICAGO is 36-18 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 74.8
CHICAGO is 20-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 92.5, OPPONENT 83.4

View Expanded Details
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to win against the money line
There are 21 trends with a total rating of 19 stars.
WASHINGTON is 10-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 45-78 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 17-25 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 11-33 against the money line (-24.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 20-52 against the money line (-37.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 34-57 against the money line (-36.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 53-89 against the money line (-60.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 44-79 against the money line (-46.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 66-113 against the money line (-67.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 123-159 against the money line (-51.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 66-112 against the money line (-58.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 124-162 against the money line (-56.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 49-61 against the money line (-34.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 60-75 against the money line (-34.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 94-142 against the money line (-53.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 51-100 against the money line (-41.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 13-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 20-26 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 12 trends with a total rating of 10 stars.
WASHINGTON is 125-150 against the money line (-58.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 64-85 against the money line (-45.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 38-68 against the money line (-35.3 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 24-51 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*)
WASHINGTON is 78-140 against the money line (-60.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 94-154 against the money line (-65.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 143-213 against the money line (-68.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 124-204 against the money line (-85.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 195-294 against the money line (-96.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 71-111 against the money line (-52.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-7.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 67-115 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to win against the money line
There are 58 trends with a total rating of 78 stars.
WASHINGTON is 12-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 90.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*)
WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*)
WASHINGTON is 12-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 4*)
CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 26-24 against the money line (-22.4 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 92-88 against the money line (-41.9 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 89-84 against the money line (-40.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 99-127 against the money line (-51.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 14-14 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 15-23 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 15-33 against the money line (-22.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 27-53 against the money line (-32.3 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 9-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 77-126 against the money line (-66.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 56-95 against the money line (-52.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 50-80 against the money line (-39.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 32-49 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 4*)
CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 6*)
CHICAGO is 19-44 against the money line (-29.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 48-69 against the money line (-40.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 27-45 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 17-27 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 50-68 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 33-50 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 23-34 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 8-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 14-25 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 69-89 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 47-70 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 64-104 against the money line (-50.2 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 4*)
CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-6.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 21 trends with a total rating of 29 stars.
WASHINGTON is 3-16 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 5*)
WASHINGTON is 256-379 against the money line (-107.1 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 75-114 against the money line (-46.5 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 163-244 against the money line (-86.6 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 120-195 against the money line (-75.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 116-186 against the money line (-78.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 49-88 against the money line (-45.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 41-78 against the money line (-44.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*)
WASHINGTON is 42-62 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 59-89 against the money line (-39.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 15-43 against the money line (-39.7 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*)
WASHINGTON is 25-56 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*)
WASHINGTON is 10-29 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*)
WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 16-67 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 18-29 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
ADVANCED TEAM STATSGo to Top
WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games9-8+6.89-713-482.041.143.0%42.582.440.943.9%41.9
Road Games5-2+7.84-27-085.640.142.0%44.687.642.043.1%45.3
Last 5 Games4-1+4.64-11-484.244.646.1%39.869.636.240.5%39.4
Division Games5-3+5.54-36-284.539.941.7%42.182.442.643.8%44.4
WASHINGTON Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)82.041.128-6543.0%7-1936.2%19-2480.0%42816217133
vs opponents surrendering83.541.230-6844.2%5-1633.4%18-2379.9%42918208134
Team Stats (Road Games)85.640.128-6642.0%7-1935.8%24-2981.7%45915226143
Stats Against (All Games)82.440.930-6843.9%6-1732.8%17-2280.0%42919227134
vs opponents averaging83.341.230-6844.1%5-1632.4%18-2279.3%43917218134
Stats Against (Road Games)87.642.031-7343.1%6-2031.4%19-2478.1%451119246125
CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games6-9-9.96-99-684.443.846.7%43.884.140.742.0%41.0
Home Games3-3-2.52-44-285.842.247.1%43.083.739.343.2%39.8
Last 5 Games1-4-6.61-43-285.041.045.0%40.089.845.447.4%42.6
Division Games4-4-3.65-34-486.245.646.1%45.680.939.640.4%42.4
CHICAGO Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)84.443.833-7146.7%3-1033.5%15-1883.9%441019217135
vs opponents surrendering81.940.530-6744.0%5-1632.9%17-2278.9%43918218144
Team Stats (Home Games)85.842.233-7047.1%2-823.5%18-2184.3%431020208135
Stats Against (All Games)84.140.729-6842.0%6-1933.3%20-2581.2%41917188114
vs opponents averaging8240.229-6743.5%5-1632.6%18-2378.8%42917208134
Stats Against (Home Games)83.739.328-6643.2%6-1834.5%20-2580.3%40720208133
Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.5,  CHICAGO 71.5
View Expanded Details
SCHEDULE AND RESULTSGo to Top
WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
5/26/2016@ SEATTLE84-82W+17029-6445.3%491629-7041.4%3511
5/29/2016@ PHOENIX77-93L+28029-7140.8%40633-6253.2%419
6/1/2016CHICAGO78-86L+15528-6642.4%421332-6549.2%3512
6/3/2016@ CHICAGO72-98L+40022-6036.7%321439-7154.9%4511
6/5/2016@ ATLANTA86-79W+35028-7437.8%49726-6738.8%458
6/8/2016@ DALLAS87-79W+15526-5844.8%521526-7435.1%4310
6/11/2016MINNESOTA76-83L+25030-7341.1%321329-5949.2%4619
6/14/2016@ CONNECTICUT109-106W-15534-7744.2%421839-8645.3%5519
6/18/2016ATLANTA95-65W-17535-6752.2%401223-5641.1%3821
6/22/2016INDIANA76-62W-20020-5238.5%371324-6338.1%4418
6/24/2016PHOENIX79-91L-14028-6344.4%411131-6746.3%409
6/26/2016MINNESOTA87-63W+30033-7047.1%44923-6137.7%3614
6/29/2016SAN ANTONIO84-67W-50030-6546.2%37725-6439.1%3911
7/1/2016@ CHICAGO           
7/6/2016@ SAN ANTONIO           
7/10/2016@ LOS ANGELES           
7/13/2016@ PHOENIX           
7/15/2016@ SEATTLE           

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
5/22/2016@ ATLANTA81-87L-20029-7737.7%601330-7341.1%445
5/24/2016LOS ANGELES80-93L+13535-6950.7%401530-6546.2%378
5/27/2016@ SAN ANTONIO78-79L-33031-6944.9%501524-6238.7%3311
5/29/2016@ DALLAS92-87W-12041-7058.6%391326-7534.7%4312
6/1/2016@ WASHINGTON86-78W-17532-6549.2%351228-6642.4%4213
6/3/2016WASHINGTON98-72W-60039-7154.9%451122-6036.7%3214
6/10/2016@ INDIANA73-64W-12033-7245.8%511423-7032.9%419
6/12/2016@ PHOENIX80-86L+12031-6647.0%411324-6835.3%4611
6/14/2016@ LOS ANGELES85-98L+28033-7047.1%36939-6758.2%316
6/17/2016@ ATLANTA97-101L-21037-8245.1%511134-7545.3%509
6/21/2016SAN ANTONIO81-75W 30-7341.1%451327-6342.9%4516
6/24/2016@ NEW YORK79-80L+17030-6844.1%36831-7243.1%4610
6/29/2016INDIANA83-95L-25029-6048.3%321432-6747.8%4113
7/1/2016WASHINGTON           
7/5/2016@ MINNESOTA           
7/8/2016NEW YORK           
7/10/2016PHOENIX           
7/13/2016LOS ANGELES           
7/15/2016DALLAS           
7/17/2016@ SEATTLE           
View Expanded Details
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORYGo to Top
All games in this series since 1997
CHICAGO is 26-16 (+7.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CHICAGO is 8-3 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CHICAGO since 1997
CHICAGO is 15-6 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997
Games played at CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons.
CHICAGO is 5-1 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
6/3/2016WASHINGTON72162 Over3622-6036.7%5-1926.3%23-2785.2%32714
 CHICAGO98-10.5SU ATS6039-7154.9%6-1346.2%14-1782.4%451111
6/1/2016CHICAGO86-4SU ATS4532-6549.2%6-1442.9%16-1888.9%35512
 WASHINGTON78163 Over3728-6642.4%8-2236.4%14-1877.8%421213
8/23/2015CHICAGO66156.5SU ATS3524-6238.7%2-825.0%16-2369.6%461015
 WASHINGTON64-2.5 Under3322-6633.3%6-2030.0%14-1877.8%471016
8/21/2015WASHINGTON85154 ATS4337-7350.7%3-1717.6%8-1080.0%34412
 CHICAGO87-5.5SU Over4537-7946.8%4-1330.8%9-1275.0%491515
8/2/2015WASHINGTON68158 ATS3925-7035.7%5-1631.2%13-1586.7%41105
 CHICAGO71-5.5SU Under3427-6939.1%4-1330.8%13-1586.7%5096
7/15/2015WASHINGTON57157.5 Under3223-7032.9%2-1020.0%9-1369.2%44914
 CHICAGO85-5.5SU ATS5138-8345.8%3-1323.1%6-875.0%54158
6/28/2015CHICAGO71154 Over3431-6547.7%0-80.0%9-1090.0%3149
 WASHINGTON86-1SU ATS4335-7050.0%10-1952.6%6-785.7%40910
View Expanded Details
COACHING TRENDSGo to Top
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to win against the money line
There are 82 trends with a total rating of 106 stars.
Thibault is 29-42 against the money line (+16.6 Units) as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 22-28 against the money line (+14.8 Units) as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 14-12 against the money line (+11.6 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 42-38 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 67-44 against the money line (+18.1 Units) on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 98-77 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 50-32 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Thibault is 25-14 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 32-27 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 98-75 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 123-94 against the money line (+30.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 86-64 against the money line (+23.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 45-30 against the money line (+21.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 53-39 against the money line (+24.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 14-11 against the money line (+10.1 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 36-21 against the money line (+19.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 12-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 20-10 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.7, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 12-4 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 5*)
Thibault is 44-21 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 79.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 34-28 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 34-29 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 17-9 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*)
Thibault is 7-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 65-46 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 116-78 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 74.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 58-41 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 73.6, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Thibault is 90-68 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 74.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 97-99 against the money line (-32.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 22-22 against the money line (-16.5 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 55-57 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 35-34 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 60-70 against the money line (-39.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 45-50 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 40-40 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 15-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 15-21 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 15-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 48-60 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 32-47 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 51-61 against the money line (-37.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 30-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 16-24 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 34-46 against the money line (-34.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 6-12 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 15-21 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 18-23 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 32-38 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 54-57 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 32-34 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 33-46 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 42-53 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 19-28 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 21-28 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 9-16 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 41-50 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 48-51 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 43-50 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 27-30 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 19-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 12-20 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 21-40 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 37-58 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 3-16 against the money line (-16.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 5*)
Chatman is 8-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*)
Chatman is 15-24 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 27-42 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*)
Chatman is 23-36 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 36-52 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 45-53 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 74-81 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 29-41 against the money line (-22.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 40-62 against the money line (-44.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 49-56 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 76-83 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 38-37 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 69-72 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 33-39 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 55-69 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 31-55 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 20-35 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 31-48 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 12 trends with a total rating of 11 stars.
Thibault is 0-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 12-21 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 11-21 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 3-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Thibault is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 21-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 72.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 11-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 15-28 against the money line (-19.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Thibault is 43-49 against the money line (-29.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 73.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 22-15 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 14-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 29-20 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX LINE TRACKER™Go to Top
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-165 (Road=+145), Closing Money Line: Home=-175 (Road=+155)
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 199 times, while the road underdog won straight up 145 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 20 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIESGo to Top
WASHINGTON
No significant injuries.
CHICAGO
[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee )

Last Updated: 4/29/2024 10:01:43 PM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.