WNBA CHICAGO Matchup 20160701

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Friday 7/1/2016

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

WASHINGTON
First Half Results
CHICAGO

-2

82.5

50
Final
40

WASHINGTON (9 - 8) at CHICAGO (6 - 9)

Friday, 7/1/2016 8:30 PM

Board		First Half
653	WASHINGTON	82
654	CHICAGO	-2

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 2 situations with a total rating of 4 stars.

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(119-69 since 1997.) (63.3%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread against opponent hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread.
(88-49 since 1997.) (64.2%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 22 situations with a total rating of 49 stars.

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(157-99 since 1997.) (61.3%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(113-64 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(66-30 since 1997.) (68.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(76-37 since 1997.) (67.3%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(109-58 since 1997.) (65.3%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(78-36 since 1997.) (68.4%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(131-75 since 1997.) (63.6%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(102-56 since 1997.) (64.6%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(99-56 since 1997.) (63.9%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(173-111 since 1997.) (60.9%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(123-72 since 1997.) (63.1%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(119-60 since 1997.) (66.5%, +53 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(83-44 since 1997.) (65.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(145-82 since 1997.) (63.9%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(115-63 since 1997.) (64.6%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(151-92 since 1997.) (62.1%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(115-60 since 1997.) (65.7%, +49 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(90-45 since 1997.) (66.7%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 66 situations with a total rating of 135 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(100-58 since 1997.) (63.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(404-299 since 1997.) (57.5%, +75.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(257-184 since 1997.) (58.3%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(152-92 since 1997.) (62.3%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(152-92 since 1997.) (62.3%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(152-92 since 1997.) (62.3%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(509-366 since 1997.) (58.2%, +106.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(382-258 since 1997.) (59.7%, +98.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(136-79 since 1997.) (63.3%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(98-55 since 1997.) (64.1%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(70-36 since 1997.) (66%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(66-33 since 1997.) (66.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(112-64 since 1997.) (63.6%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(69-37 since 1997.) (65.1%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(107-58 since 1997.) (64.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(431-312 since 1997.) (58%, +87.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(810-629 since 1997.) (56.3%, +118.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(294-182 since 1997.) (61.8%, +93.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(506-376 since 1997.) (57.4%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(96-51 since 1997.) (65.3%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(825-618 since 1997.) (57.2%, +145.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(145-87 since 1997.) (62.5%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(417-290 since 1997.) (59%, +98 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(280-184 since 1997.) (60.3%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(145-84 since 1997.) (63.3%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(111-60 since 1997.) (64.9%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(240-156 since 1997.) (60.6%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(865-646 since 1997.) (57.2%, +154.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(255-164 since 1997.) (60.9%, +74.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(540-405 since 1997.) (57.1%, +94.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(499-360 since 1997.) (58.1%, +103 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(157-93 since 1997.) (62.8%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(117-67 since 1997.) (63.6%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(308-222 since 1997.) (58.1%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(663-509 since 1997.) (56.6%, +103.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(45-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(87-46 since 1997.) (65.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(69-36 since 1997.) (65.7%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(74-37 since 1997.) (66.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(102-58 since 1997.) (63.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(509-366 since 1997.) (58.2%, +106.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(382-258 since 1997.) (59.7%, +98.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after scoring 75 points or more.
(159-104 since 1997.) (60.5%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(326-226 since 1997.) (59.1%, +77.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(214-143 since 1997.) (59.9%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(141-81 since 1997.) (63.5%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(85-45 since 1997.) (65.4%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(101-56 since 1997.) (64.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(66-31 since 1997.) (68%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(439-325 since 1997.) (57.5%, +81.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(290-198 since 1997.) (59.4%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(371-264 since 1997.) (58.4%, +80.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(145-89 since 1997.) (62%, +47.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(287-198 since 1997.) (59.2%, +69.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(272-188 since 1997.) (59.1%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(123-65 since 1997.) (65.4%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(87-46 since 1997.) (65.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(231-137 since 1997.) (62.8%, +80.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(411-284 since 1997.) (59.1%, +98.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(160-96 since 1997.) (62.5%, +54.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(168-99 since 1997.) (62.9%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(272-184 since 1997.) (59.6%, +69.6 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
WASHINGTON	80		41		28-67	42.2%	7-19	37.4%	17-21	79.4%	41	10	12
CHICAGO	84		42		33-72	46.3%	4-12	34.9%	14-17	82.7%	45	12	11

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 484 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 476 times.
No Edge.

In 1000 simulated games, 521 games went over first half total, while 431 games went under first half total.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.2, OPPONENT 38.9

WASHINGTON is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.0, OPPONENT 37.0

WASHINGTON is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.9, OPPONENT 37.1

WASHINGTON is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.5, OPPONENT 37.2

CHICAGO is 30-48 against the 1rst half line (-22.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.7, OPPONENT 39.5

CHICAGO is 72-102 against the 1rst half line (-40.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 42.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 86-156 against the 1rst half line (-85.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 40.8

WASHINGTON is 46-89 against the 1rst half line (-51.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 42.5

WASHINGTON is 90-125 against the 1rst half line (-47.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 37.4

CHICAGO is 103-53 against the 1rst half line (+44.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 38.7

CHICAGO is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.7, OPPONENT 41.0

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 99-72 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 36.4

WASHINGTON is 183-140 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 35.9

WASHINGTON is 134-97 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.2

WASHINGTON is 109-64 UNDER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.1

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
WASHINGTON
CHICAGO	-0.5

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.

WASHINGTON is 31-16 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 7-21 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 13 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.

WASHINGTON is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 45.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 27-14 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.1, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 26-13 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 12 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.

WASHINGTON is 158-110 UNDER (+37.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 89-56 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 63-40 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 63-40 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 179-135 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 52-33 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 76-52 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 144-103 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 191-137 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 106-77 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 161-121 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 82-58 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 32 trends with a total rating of 28 stars.

WASHINGTON is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 11-1 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 3*)

WASHINGTON is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.5, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 3*)

WASHINGTON is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.2, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 47-69 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) in home games after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 49-71 against the 1rst half line (-29.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 33-52 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 26-43 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 1-10 against the 1rst half line (-10.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 1-10 against the 1rst half line (-10.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 3*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 6 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.

WASHINGTON is 56-86 against the 1rst half line (-38.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 46-70 against the 1rst half line (-31.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 25-53 against the 1rst half line (-33.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 22-45 against the 1rst half line (-27.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 12-26 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 11-25 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 32 trends with a total rating of 20 stars.

WASHINGTON is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.2, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 58-36 OVER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 40-20 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 37-23 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 27-14 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 37-21 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 29-15 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 37-21 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 28-13 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 54-33 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 40-21 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 34-20 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 32-18 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 50-30 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 40-19 OVER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 32-11 OVER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 24 trends with a total rating of 12 stars.

WASHINGTON is 72-49 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 245-152 UNDER (+77.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 173-136 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 51-26 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 110-82 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 44-25 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 173-123 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 81-55 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 72-48 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 43-25 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 150-100 UNDER (+40.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 123-88 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 91-56 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 63-40 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 33-17 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 136-99 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 82-56 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 125-94 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 106-77 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 174-126 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 169-115 UNDER (+42.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 150-99 UNDER (+41.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	9-8	+6.8	9-7	13-4	82.0	41.1	43.0%	42.5	82.4	40.9	43.9%	41.9
Road Games	5-2	+7.8	4-2	7-0	85.6	40.1	42.0%	44.6	87.6	42.0	43.1%	45.3
Last 5 Games	4-1	+4.6	4-1	1-4	84.2	44.6	46.1%	39.8	69.6	36.2	40.5%	39.4
Division Games	5-3	+5.5	4-3	6-2	84.5	39.9	41.7%	42.1	82.4	42.6	43.8%	44.4

WASHINGTON Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	82.0	41.1	28-65	43.0%	7-19	36.2%	19-24	80.0%	42	8	16	21	7	13	3
vs opponents surrendering	83.5	41.2	30-68	44.2%	5-16	33.4%	18-23	79.9%	42	9	18	20	8	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	85.6	40.1	28-66	42.0%	7-19	35.8%	24-29	81.7%	45	9	15	22	6	14	3
Stats Against (All Games)	82.4	40.9	30-68	43.9%	6-17	32.8%	17-22	80.0%	42	9	19	22	7	13	4
vs opponents averaging	83.3	41.2	30-68	44.1%	5-16	32.4%	18-22	79.3%	43	9	17	21	8	13	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	87.6	42.0	31-73	43.1%	6-20	31.4%	19-24	78.1%	45	11	19	24	6	12	5

CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	6-9	-9.9	6-9	9-6	84.4	43.8	46.7%	43.8	84.1	40.7	42.0%	41.0
Home Games	3-3	-2.5	2-4	4-2	85.8	42.2	47.1%	43.0	83.7	39.3	43.2%	39.8
Last 5 Games	1-4	-6.6	1-4	3-2	85.0	41.0	45.0%	40.0	89.8	45.4	47.4%	42.6
Division Games	4-4	-3.6	5-3	4-4	86.2	45.6	46.1%	45.6	80.9	39.6	40.4%	42.4

CHICAGO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	84.4	43.8	33-71	46.7%	3-10	33.5%	15-18	83.9%	44	10	19	21	7	13	5
vs opponents surrendering	81.9	40.5	30-67	44.0%	5-16	32.9%	17-22	78.9%	43	9	18	21	8	14	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	85.8	42.2	33-70	47.1%	2-8	23.5%	18-21	84.3%	43	10	20	20	8	13	5
Stats Against (All Games)	84.1	40.7	29-68	42.0%	6-19	33.3%	20-25	81.2%	41	9	17	18	8	11	4
vs opponents averaging	82	40.2	29-67	43.5%	5-16	32.6%	18-23	78.8%	42	9	17	20	8	13	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	83.7	39.3	28-66	43.2%	6-18	34.5%	20-25	80.3%	40	7	20	20	8	13	3

Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.5, CHICAGO 71.5

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
5/26/2016	@ SEATTLE	84-82	40-33	2.5	W	75	U	29-64	45.3%	49	16	29-70	41.4%	35	11
5/29/2016	@ PHOENIX	77-93	45-42	4.5	W	80	O	29-71	40.8%	40	6	33-62	53.2%	41	9
6/1/2016	CHICAGO	78-86	37-45	2	L	80.5	O	28-66	42.4%	42	13	32-65	49.2%	35	12
6/3/2016	@ CHICAGO	72-98	36-60	6	L	80	O	22-60	36.7%	32	14	39-71	54.9%	45	11
6/5/2016	@ ATLANTA	86-79	44-43	5.5	W	80.5	O	28-74	37.8%	49	7	26-67	38.8%	45	8
6/8/2016	@ DALLAS	87-79	40-37	2	W	80	U	26-58	44.8%	52	15	26-74	35.1%	43	10
6/11/2016	MINNESOTA	76-83	47-45	4	W	78.5	O	30-73	41.1%	32	13	29-59	49.2%	46	19
6/14/2016	@ CONNECTICUT	109-106	44-42	-1.5	W	80.5	O	34-77	44.2%	42	18	39-86	45.3%	55	19
6/18/2016	ATLANTA	95-65	47-34	-2	W	82	U	35-67	52.2%	40	12	23-56	41.1%	38	21
6/22/2016	INDIANA	76-62	34-35	-2.5	L	78.5	U	20-52	38.5%	37	13	24-63	38.1%	44	18
6/24/2016	PHOENIX	79-91	40-55	-1.5	L	82.5	O	28-63	44.4%	41	11	31-67	46.3%	40	9
6/26/2016	MINNESOTA	87-63	52-30	5	W	79	O	33-70	47.1%	44	9	23-61	37.7%	36	14
6/29/2016	SAN ANTONIO	84-67	50-27	-5.5	W	75.5	O	30-65	46.2%	37	7	25-64	39.1%	39	11
7/1/2016	@ CHICAGO
7/6/2016	@ SAN ANTONIO
7/10/2016	@ LOS ANGELES
7/13/2016	@ PHOENIX
7/15/2016	@ SEATTLE

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
5/22/2016	@ ATLANTA	81-87	41-37	-2.5	W	84.5	U	29-77	37.7%	60	13	30-73	41.1%	44	5
5/24/2016	LOS ANGELES	80-93	35-53	1.5	L	82	O	35-69	50.7%	40	15	30-65	46.2%	37	8
5/27/2016	@ SAN ANTONIO	78-79	42-33	-4	W	76	U	31-69	44.9%	50	15	24-62	38.7%	33	11
5/29/2016	@ DALLAS	92-87	56-47	-1	W	85	O	41-70	58.6%	39	13	26-75	34.7%	43	12
6/1/2016	@ WASHINGTON	86-78	45-37	-2	W	80.5	O	32-65	49.2%	35	12	28-66	42.4%	42	13
6/3/2016	WASHINGTON	98-72	60-36	-6	W	80	O	39-71	54.9%	45	11	22-60	36.7%	32	14
6/10/2016	@ INDIANA	73-64	41-33	-1	W	85	U	33-72	45.8%	51	14	23-70	32.9%	41	9
6/12/2016	@ PHOENIX	80-86	47-36	1.5	W	86.5	U	31-66	47.0%	41	13	24-68	35.3%	46	11
6/14/2016	@ LOS ANGELES	85-98	37-46	4.5	L	83.5	U	33-70	47.1%	36	9	39-67	58.2%	31	6
6/17/2016	@ ATLANTA	97-101	55-55	-2.5	L	87.5	O	37-82	45.1%	51	11	34-75	45.3%	50	9
6/21/2016	SAN ANTONIO	81-75	35-32	-8	L	79.5	U	30-73	41.1%	45	13	27-63	42.9%	45	16
6/24/2016	@ NEW YORK	79-80	40-50	2.5	L	80	O	30-68	44.1%	36	8	31-72	43.1%	46	10
6/29/2016	INDIANA	83-95	38-44	-3	L	82.5	U	29-60	48.3%	32	14	32-67	47.8%	41	13
7/1/2016	WASHINGTON
7/5/2016	@ MINNESOTA
7/8/2016	NEW YORK
7/10/2016	PHOENIX
7/13/2016	LOS ANGELES
7/15/2016	DALLAS
7/17/2016	@ SEATTLE

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

WASHINGTON is 23-19 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997

22 of 42 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

CHICAGO is 6-5 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

6 of 11 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CHICAGO since 1997

WASHINGTON is 14-7 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997

11 of 21 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons.

CHICAGO is 3-3 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

4 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
6/3/2016	WASHINGTON	72	162	Over	36	22-60	36.7%	5-19	26.3%	23-27	85.2%	32	7	14
	CHICAGO	98	-10.5	SU ATS	60	39-71	54.9%	6-13	46.2%	14-17	82.4%	45	11	11
6/1/2016	CHICAGO	86	-4	SU ATS	45	32-65	49.2%	6-14	42.9%	16-18	88.9%	35	5	12
	WASHINGTON	78	163	Over	37	28-66	42.4%	8-22	36.4%	14-18	77.8%	42	12	13
8/23/2015	CHICAGO	66	156.5	SU ATS	35	24-62	38.7%	2-8	25.0%	16-23	69.6%	46	10	15
	WASHINGTON	64	-2.5	Under	33	22-66	33.3%	6-20	30.0%	14-18	77.8%	47	10	16
8/21/2015	WASHINGTON	85	154	ATS	43	37-73	50.7%	3-17	17.6%	8-10	80.0%	34	4	12
	CHICAGO	87	-5.5	SU Over	45	37-79	46.8%	4-13	30.8%	9-12	75.0%	49	15	15
8/2/2015	WASHINGTON	68	158	ATS	39	25-70	35.7%	5-16	31.2%	13-15	86.7%	41	10	5
	CHICAGO	71	-5.5	SU Under	34	27-69	39.1%	4-13	30.8%	13-15	86.7%	50	9	6
7/15/2015	WASHINGTON	57	157.5	Under	32	23-70	32.9%	2-10	20.0%	9-13	69.2%	44	9	14
	CHICAGO	85	-5.5	SU ATS	51	38-83	45.8%	3-13	23.1%	6-8	75.0%	54	15	8
6/28/2015	CHICAGO	71	154	Over	34	31-65	47.7%	0-8	0.0%	9-10	90.0%	31	4	9
	WASHINGTON	86	-1	SU ATS	43	35-70	50.0%	10-19	52.6%	6-7	85.7%	40	9	10

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 114 trends with a total rating of 105 stars.

Thibault is 73-53 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 44-27 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 33-17 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 41-21 against the 1rst half line (+17.9 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 41-21 against the 1rst half line (+17.9 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) on Friday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 43-29 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.7, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 43-26 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 43-27 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 31-20 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.2, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 42-23 against the 1rst half line (+16.7 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 40.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 38-23 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 38.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 36-24 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 58-44 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 20-7 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 38-23 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 57-43 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 35-24 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 33-22 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 55-37 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 49-34 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 26-15 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 43-30 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 88-108 against the 1rst half line (-30.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 28-52 against the 1rst half line (-29.2 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 14-30 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 34-61 against the 1rst half line (-33.1 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 33-61 against the 1rst half line (-34.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 28-40 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in home games on Friday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 56-72 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 51-71 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 27-42 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 58-71 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 20-32 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 8-22 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 30-49 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 9-24 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 20-34 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 33.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 45-63 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 33-45 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 47-68 against the 1rst half line (-27.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 25-45 against the 1rst half line (-24.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 15-26 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.7, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 45-60 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 30-50 against the 1rst half line (-25.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 22-37 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 47-63 against the 1rst half line (-22.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 42-55 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 15-31 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 16-29 against the 1rst half line (-15.9 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 21-36 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 15-29 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 9-23 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 35-51 against the 1rst half line (-21.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 20-31 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 23-37 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 40-55 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 38-58 against the 1rst half line (-25.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 68-86 against the 1rst half line (-26.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 44-56 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 42-61 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 69-89 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 6-18 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 12-30 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 23-43 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 10-23 against the 1rst half line (-15.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 33-45 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 20-34 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 5 stars.

Thibault is 29-50 against the 1rst half line (-26.0 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 35.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 5-18 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 36.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Thibault is 9-26 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 44 trends with a total rating of 21 stars.

Thibault is 119-87 OVER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 37.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 60-39 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 38.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.9, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 29-15 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 38.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 37-19 OVER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 45-25 OVER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 38.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 39-26 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.5, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 37-22 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 40.9, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.7, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 109-88 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 70-57 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 73-57 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 60-46 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 56-42 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 61-47 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 49-29 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 37-24 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 30-15 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 39-27 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 28-12 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 63-43 OVER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 50-31 OVER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 38-23 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 28-17 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 63-50 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 41-27 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 47-34 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 58-39 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 63-49 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 28-17 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 51-38 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 55-40 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 84-71 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 89-71 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 46-34 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 70-54 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 16 trends with a total rating of 7 stars.

Thibault is 49-32 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 40-28 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 38-25 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 38-23 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 35.8, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 36.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 53-29 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 36.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Thibault is 36-20 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 36.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 35.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 36-25 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Thibault is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = -2, Closing First Half Line = -2

Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 181 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 154 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 21 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 17 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 82, Closing First Half Total = 82

Since 1997, 11 games went over the first half total, while 9 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = -2, Closing First Half Total = 82

Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times.

Since 1997, 5 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

WASHINGTON

No significant injuries.

CHICAGO

[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee )

Last Updated: 4/30/2024 3:00:52 AM EST.