|
|
KANSAS TEXAS TECH |
|
| 59 | 16 Final 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
391 | KANSAS | +23.5 | Over 53 | 392 | TEXAS TECH | -11.5 | Under 65 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-4 | -3.4 | 3-3 | 2-3 | 27.7 | 10.3 | 347.5 | (5.3) | 0.8 | 26.5 | 15.3 | 401.2 | (5.8) | 3.0 | Road Games | 1-2 | +0.4 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 20.0 | 4.7 | 306.0 | (4.9) | 1.0 | 23.7 | 14.7 | 412.0 | (5.9) | 3.3 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 19.0 | 4.7 | 308.3 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 37.3 | 22.7 | 508.0 | (7.1) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-4 | -3.4 | 3-3 | 2-3 | 27.7 | 10.3 | 347.5 | (5.3) | 0.8 | 26.5 | 15.3 | 401.2 | (5.8) | 3.0 | Conference Games | 0-3 | -2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 19.0 | 4.7 | 308.3 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 37.3 | 22.7 | 508.0 | (7.1) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.7 | 10.3 | 17.3 | 29:45 | 35-166 | (4.7) | 19-30 | 62.8% | 182 | (6) | 66-347 | (5.3) | (12.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.1 | 15.1 | 20.1 | 31:44 | 39-179 | (4.6) | 18-29 | 61.1% | 204 | (6.9) | 68-383 | (5.6) | (13.1) | Offense Road Games | 20.0 | 4.7 | 16.7 | 28:60 | 33-139 | (4.2) | 18-29 | 62.5% | 167 | (5.7) | 62-306 | (4.9) | (15.3) | Defense (All Games) | 26.5 | 15.3 | 19.8 | 30:15 | 39-177 | (4.5) | 18-29 | 60.5% | 224 | (7.6) | 69-401 | (5.8) | (15.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.4 | 14.2 | 21.1 | 29:19 | 38-160 | (4.2) | 19-33 | 58.1% | 235 | (7.2) | 70-395 | (5.6) | (14.5) | Defense Road Games | 23.7 | 14.7 | 21.0 | 30:60 | 35-157 | (4.4) | 22-34 | 64.7% | 255 | (7.5) | 69-412 | (5.9) | (17.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | +6.6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 43.2 | 21.8 | 551.7 | (6.2) | 1.3 | 28.2 | 19.5 | 441.5 | (6) | 1.7 | Home Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 58.0 | 29.0 | 616.7 | (6.7) | 1.7 | 30.3 | 21.0 | 435.3 | (5.5) | 1.3 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +6.6 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.7 | 12.3 | 479.0 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 24.3 | 19.7 | 428.7 | (6.1) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 3-1 | +5.1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 53.7 | 27.7 | 617.7 | (6.7) | 1.7 | 27.0 | 20.0 | 423.0 | (5.6) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 2-1 | +6.6 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.7 | 12.3 | 479.0 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 24.3 | 19.7 | 428.7 | (6.1) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 43.2 | 21.8 | 29.8 | 34:03 | 44-178 | (4.1) | 30-45 | 67.0% | 373 | (8.3) | 89-552 | (6.2) | (12.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.9 | 18.2 | 24 | 32:08 | 42-167 | (4) | 23-36 | 64.0% | 287 | (8) | 78-454 | (5.8) | (13) | Offense Home Games | 58.0 | 29.0 | 32.0 | 31:57 | 45-177 | (4) | 33-47 | 69.5% | 440 | (9.4) | 92-617 | (6.7) | (10.6) | Defense (All Games) | 28.2 | 19.5 | 21.2 | 25:57 | 33-142 | (4.3) | 22-40 | 55.8% | 299 | (7.5) | 73-441 | (6) | (15.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 32.5 | 17.5 | 21.8 | 28:50 | 38-178 | (4.7) | 20-34 | 58.3% | 265 | (7.8) | 72-443 | (6.2) | (13.6) | Defense Home Games | 30.3 | 21.0 | 22.3 | 28:03 | 38-131 | (3.5) | 23-42 | 54.4% | 304 | (7.3) | 80-435 | (5.5) | (14.4) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: KANSAS 26.3, TEXAS TECH 36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | NICHOLLS ST | 23-26 | L | -9.5 | L | | - | 32-56 | 21-38-199 | 1 | 50-187 | 12-24-142 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | 31-7 | W | 3 | W | 48 | U | 45-216 | 18-27-145 | 0 | 28-103 | 18-32-177 | 6 | 9/15/2018 | RUTGERS | 55-14 | W | 1 | W | 44.5 | O | 48-400 | 15-25-144 | 0 | 33-150 | 14-31-124 | 6 | 9/22/2018 | @ BAYLOR | 7-26 | L | 7.5 | L | 54.5 | U | 28-122 | 16-27-149 | 0 | 39-190 | 20-29-257 | 0 | 9/29/2018 | OKLAHOMA ST | 28-48 | L | 17 | L | 56 | O | 32-121 | 24-32-247 | 1 | 46-256 | 15-20-312 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | @ W VIRGINIA | 22-38 | L | 27.5 | W | 64 | U | 26-80 | 21-34-206 | 3 | 39-177 | 28-41-332 | 4 | 10/20/2018 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | *OLE MISS | 27-47 | L | 2.5 | L | 72 | O | 39-164 | 33-56-322 | 0 | 28-210 | 22-32-336 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | LAMAR | 77-0 | W | -49 | W | 74 | O | 51-264 | 30-35-419 | 1 | 42-102 | 10-32-80 | 4 | 9/15/2018 | HOUSTON | 63-49 | W | -2 | W | 68.5 | O | 41-99 | 43-59-605 | 1 | 40-173 | 31-52-462 | 0 | 9/22/2018 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 41-17 | W | 14.5 | W | 77 | U | 46-224 | 35-46-397 | 2 | 24-128 | 18-38-258 | 2 | 9/29/2018 | W VIRGINIA | 34-42 | L | 3.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 42-168 | 25-47-295 | 3 | 32-119 | 27-41-370 | 0 | 10/11/2018 | @ TCU | 17-14 | W | 7.5 | W | 57.5 | U | 43-151 | 15-27-202 | 1 | 32-121 | 26-45-290 | 3 | 10/20/2018 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| KANSAS: As the above preseason conference title odds indicate, Kansas is far and away the worst team in the Big 12'we'd actually be more curious to see what their odds would be to finish not last. It's difficult to gauge the precise hotness of head coach David Beaty's seat, given that few coaches with a 3-33 program record would be given a fourth year to prove themselves. The Jayhawks will at least get a decent shot at a Power Five win when they host Rutgers on September 15. | | TEXAS TECH: Lubbock has frozen over: There's currently more faith in the Red Raiders' defense than there is in their offense. The D took huge strides from 2016 to 2017, and now almost everyone is back from last year. On offense, Kliff Kingsbury needs to break in a new quarterback, a new running back and new wideouts. The line is strong, though, forming a solid foundation for a unit that has consistently been among the nation's best throughout this century. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/16/2024 1:55:06 PM EST. |
|
|