|
|
MIAMI OHIO ARMY |
|
| 47 | 30 Final 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
329 | MIAMI OHIO | +13.5 | Over 41 | 330 | ARMY | -1.5 | Under 53 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-4 | -0.6 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 25.7 | 13.7 | 360.6 | (5.5) | 1.0 | 24.0 | 10.6 | 350.1 | (5) | 1.6 | Road Games | 2-2 | +0.6 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 20.5 | 10.2 | 306.7 | (4.9) | 1.5 | 21.7 | 9.7 | 293.0 | (4.2) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.7 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 37.0 | 20.7 | 425.0 | (6.2) | 1.0 | 21.0 | 8.0 | 365.0 | (5.4) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 3-4 | -0.6 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 25.7 | 13.7 | 360.6 | (5.5) | 1.0 | 24.0 | 10.6 | 350.1 | (5) | 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.7 | 13.7 | 17.9 | 29:39 | 35-155 | (4.4) | 19-31 | 60.5% | 206 | (6.7) | 66-361 | (5.5) | (14) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.3 | 14.3 | 20.3 | 30:31 | 38-171 | (4.4) | 18-32 | 57.6% | 228 | (7.2) | 70-399 | (5.7) | (13.6) | Offense Road Games | 20.5 | 10.2 | 14.2 | 28:56 | 35-162 | (4.6) | 17-28 | 59.8% | 145 | (5.2) | 63-307 | (4.9) | (15) | Defense (All Games) | 24.0 | 10.6 | 21.3 | 30:21 | 38-124 | (3.3) | 20-33 | 60.0% | 226 | (6.9) | 70-350 | (5) | (14.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29 | 15.1 | 21.8 | 30:27 | 39-166 | (4.3) | 19-33 | 58.3% | 234 | (7.1) | 72-400 | (5.5) | (13.8) | Defense Road Games | 21.7 | 9.7 | 20.0 | 31:04 | 39-112 | (2.8) | 18-30 | 59.0% | 181 | (5.9) | 70-293 | (4.2) | (13.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | +4.2 | 4-1 | 3-3 | 32.5 | 14.5 | 414.3 | (5.5) | 0.8 | 18.8 | 10.3 | 323.5 | (6.5) | 1.5 | Home Games | 2-0 | +2 | 1-0 | 0-2 | 33.0 | 19.0 | 487.5 | (6.2) | 0.0 | 17.5 | 7.0 | 389.5 | (7.4) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +3.2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 38.3 | 16.3 | 382.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | 14.7 | 10.3 | 260.3 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 4-0 | +5.2 | 3-0 | 2-2 | 40.0 | 18.2 | 435.5 | (5.9) | 0.2 | 12.7 | 6.0 | 301.2 | (5.8) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 32.5 | 14.5 | 23.0 | 39:44 | 66-313 | (4.8) | 4-10 | 46.6% | 101 | (10.4) | 75-414 | (5.5) | (12.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29 | 13.1 | 21.4 | 32:44 | 43-176 | (4.1) | 18-32 | 56.6% | 234 | (7.3) | 75-411 | (5.5) | (14.2) | Offense Home Games | 33.0 | 19.0 | 23.0 | 41:24 | 70-376 | (5.4) | 4-9 | 44.4% | 111 | (12.4) | 79-487 | (6.2) | (14.8) | Defense (All Games) | 18.8 | 10.3 | 16.3 | 20:16 | 26-111 | (4.2) | 14-24 | 60.1% | 213 | (8.9) | 50-323 | (6.5) | (17.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33.9 | 17.1 | 21.4 | 28:16 | 36-148 | (4.1) | 20-34 | 59.2% | 275 | (8.2) | 70-423 | (6.1) | (12.5) | Defense Home Games | 17.5 | 7.0 | 18.0 | 18:36 | 18-75 | (4.2) | 19-34 | 56.5% | 314 | (9.1) | 52-389 | (7.4) | (22.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI OHIO 25.9, ARMY 30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | MARSHALL | 28-35 | L | -1.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 27-87 | 25-46-357 | 0 | 38-171 | 24-37-272 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | *CINCINNATI | 0-21 | L | -1 | L | 45 | U | 19-59 | 22-41-139 | 1 | 51-188 | 6-11-45 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 3-26 | L | 13.5 | L | 47.5 | U | 31-91 | 11-23-108 | 3 | 44-118 | 14-26-177 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 38-23 | W | -6.5 | W | 55 | O | 52-289 | 10-15-119 | 0 | 34-85 | 33-50-300 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | W MICHIGAN | 39-40 | L | 3 | W | 53 | O | 27-55 | 22-32-294 | 0 | 37-123 | 27-42-439 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | @ AKRON | 41-17 | W | 4.5 | W | 47 | O | 38-208 | 24-33-214 | 2 | 28-56 | 19-35-203 | 5 | 10/13/2018 | KENT ST | 31-6 | W | -11 | W | 58.5 | U | 51-295 | 16-25-209 | 1 | 31-125 | 15-29-149 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/30/2018 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2018 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/14/2018 | @ N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2018 | @ DUKE | 14-34 | L | 13.5 | L | 46.5 | O | 47-168 | 10-21-197 | 2 | 35-184 | 13-17-197 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | LIBERTY | 38-14 | W | -7.5 | W | 58 | U | 74-449 | 2-8-61 | 0 | 23-110 | 19-37-307 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | HAWAII | 28-21 | W | -7 | T | 62 | U | 66-303 | 6-10-162 | 0 | 13-41 | 20-32-321 | 0 | 9/22/2018 | @ OKLAHOMA | 21-28 | L | 28.5 | W | 60 | U | 78-339 | 3-9-40 | 2 | 25-190 | 11-15-165 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | @ BUFFALO | 42-13 | W | 7 | W | 54 | O | 64-281 | 4-5-91 | 1 | 31-103 | 10-24-152 | 0 | 10/13/2018 | @ SAN JOSE ST | 52-3 | W | -17.5 | W | 50.5 | O | 65-341 | 2-5-54 | 0 | 30-36 | 13-18-135 | 4 | 10/20/2018 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | AIR FORCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | LAFAYETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | COLGATE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MIAMI OHIO: Quarterback Gus Ragland and first-team All-MAC wide receiver James Gardner form the foundation of one of the conference's best passing attacks. With the two of them feeding off of one another, the RedHawks will be explosive offensively. They'll just need a bit of help from the running game, which should be more than doable with 2017 leading rushers Kenny Young and Alonzo Smith both returning.. Defensively, Miami returns eight starters. The problem is that the secondary is a bit depleted, which could be an issue. The RedHawks lost a lot of close games last year, and mistakes on the backend could similarly doom them in 2018. | | ARMY: Army's riding high entering 2018, having won four of five (all as underdogs) to finish last season with a 10-3 record. The campaign marked a big jump over expectations (O/U 7.5 wins), and returning talent on both sides of the ball means they're positioned to surpass the same preseason win total this time around. Superstar option QB Ahmad Bradshaw's departure raises a big question mark, but the rest of a stacked backfield returns to West Point. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:27:40 AM EST. |
|
|