| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
155
| 78
Final
79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | CHICAGO | -330 | | 602 | SAN ANTONIO | +250 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(301-211 since 1997.) (58.8%, +82.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team from last season - outscored by opponents by 3 or more points/game, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(29-26 since 1997.) (52.7%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team from last season - outscored by opponents by 3 or more points/game, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(40-34 since 1997.) (54.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - marginal winning team from last season who won between 51% and 60% of their games, in non-conference games.
(35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - horrible defensive team from last season - allowed 75 or more points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(229-92 since 1997.) (71.3%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(65-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +39.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(56-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(82-20 since 1997.) (80.4%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(39-21 since 1997.) (65%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less.
(32-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 79 | | 32-70 | 45.8% | 4-12 | 31.0% | 11-14 | 79.6% | 49 | 10 | 12 | | SAN ANTONIO | 68 | | 26-70 | 36.9% | 4-14 | 28.7% | 13-17 | 77.3% | 42 | 9 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 770 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 209 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 75.9 | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 76.8 | CHICAGO is 35-19 against the money line (+20.5 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 69.0 | CHICAGO is 35-20 against the money line (+20.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 76.5 | CHICAGO is 18-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.4, OPPONENT 82.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.4, OPPONENT 75.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 34-70 against the money line (-40.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 32-61 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 24-29 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 11-23 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 78.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.9, OPPONENT 80.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-15 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 84.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.4, OPPONENT 79.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 40-74 against the money line (-35.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 77.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.1, OPPONENT 76.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-16 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 66.7, OPPONENT 77.6 |
|
CHICAGO is 85-126 against the money line (-65.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 23-43 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 50-81 against the money line (-50.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.9 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 88-99 against the money line (-42.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 70-73 against the money line (-37.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 15-11 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games on Friday since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-27 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-25 against the money line (-17.3 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 66.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 115-117 against the money line (-57.8 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-92 against the money line (-53.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-133 against the money line (-61.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 69-106 against the money line (-45.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 28-42 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 56-55 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-140 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-96 against the money line (-44.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-38 against the money line (-37.6 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-111 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 65-95 against the money line (-37.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 64-75 against the money line (-31.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 62-109 against the money line (-42.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-112 against the money line (-42.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-128 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-122 against the money line (-46.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-21 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 66.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 8-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-13 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 8-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-52 against the money line (-29.0 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 73-122 against the money line (-61.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-92 against the money line (-49.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-28 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-76 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-46 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-24 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 44-65 against the money line (-35.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-42 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-24 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 68-88 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 46-62 against the money line (-29.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-44 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-21 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-16 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-15 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 63-102 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 22-15 | -1.5 | 16-20 | 22-15 | 82.9 | 42.4 | 44.8% | 43.9 | 79.5 | 39.8 | 42.9% | 42.1 | | Road Games | 8-10 | -3.2 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 79.6 | 41.8 | 43.7% | 42.9 | 80.6 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 44.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 83.0 | 44.6 | 46.4% | 41.2 | 83.6 | 44.0 | 44.7% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.9 | 42.4 | 32-71 | 44.8% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 82.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.6 | 41.8 | 30-70 | 43.7% | 4-12 | 31.2% | 15-18 | 81.0% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-26 | -15 | 16-16 | 13-21 | 68.1 | 34.1 | 39.0% | 40.5 | 76.7 | 37.6 | 45.9% | 42.7 | | Home Games | 7-10 | -3.2 | 7-10 | 6-11 | 69.5 | 35.4 | 40.1% | 41.8 | 76.3 | 38.2 | 46.0% | 41.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 2-2 | 0-5 | 59.8 | 30.6 | 32.5% | 45.0 | 69.4 | 34.2 | 42.9% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.1 | 34.1 | 25-65 | 39.0% | 4-13 | 29.5% | 14-18 | 77.7% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.8 | 28-65 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.5 | 35.4 | 25-64 | 40.1% | 4-12 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 74.9% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.7 | 37.6 | 31-67 | 45.9% | 4-12 | 30.9% | 12-15 | 76.3% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75 | 37.8 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-18 | 80.0% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.3 | 38.2 | 31-67 | 46.0% | 4-11 | 35.1% | 11-15 | 72.7% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.7, SAN ANTONIO 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-70 | W | -550 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 55 | 16 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 43 | 17 | | 5/18/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80-97 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | | 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | L | +135 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | ATLANTA | 63-73 | L | +220 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 50 | 12 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 48 | 15 | | 5/19/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 68-72 | L | +145 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 44 | 15 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 11 | | 5/21/2016 | @ DALLAS | 77-82 | L | +600 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 53 | 13 | | 5/27/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/9/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SAN ANTONIO is 10-10 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 2-2 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 5-5 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 1-1 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/19/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 82 | 156 | ATS | 35 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 32 | 5 | 9 | | | CHICAGO | 93 | -11.5 | SU Over | 50 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 43 | 14 | 12 | 6/20/2015 | CHICAGO | 95 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 42-76 | 55.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 41 | 8 | 12 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 87 | 153 | Over | 40 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 49 | 13 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Hughes is 158-199 against the money line (-52.5 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 92-88 against the money line (-41.4 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 82-78 against the money line (-40.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 30-48 against the money line (-25.7 Units) on Friday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 60-70 against the money line (-24.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 95-124 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-70 against the money line (-24.6 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 74-94 against the money line (-31.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 56-77 against the money line (-28.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 24-33 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 79-98 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 57-66 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 81-107 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 52-76 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 25-30 against the money line (-27.8 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 80-86 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 60-77 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 83-117 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 46-80 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 18-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 36-41 against the money line (-23.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 77-91 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 74-89 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 81-111 against the money line (-31.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 42-63 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 73-69 against the money line (-21.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 93-93 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 24-39 against the money line (-27.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 27-35 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 2-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-39 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 41-48 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-56 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 28-44 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 48-56 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-34 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 33-42 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 6-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 11-20 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 5-12 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 2-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 17-31 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-22 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-14 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-42 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 8-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 1-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 38-48 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-24 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 19-25 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-41 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 4-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 40-48 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-46 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 6-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-37 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 109-110 against the money line (+4.6 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 32 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/26/2016 - Courtney Vandersloot "?" Friday vs. SA Stars ( Ankle ) | |
| [G] 05/14/2016 - Danielle Robinson out indefinitely ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 8:57:57 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|