| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK
MINNESOTA |
|
|
156.5
| 95
Final
92 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | NEW YORK | +400 | | 656 | MINNESOTA | -600 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(326-131 since 1997.) (71.3%, +91 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(312-217 since 1997.) (59%, +89.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(307-116 since 1997.) (72.6%, +86.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(200-71 since 1997.) (73.8%, +69.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(182-61 since 1997.) (74.9%, +61.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(235-97 since 1997.) (70.8%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(188-63 since 1997.) (74.9%, +51.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(106-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(119-51 since 1997.) (70%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(82-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(78-25 since 1997.) (75.7%, +39.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(80-40 since 1997.) (66.7%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(80-43 since 1997.) (65%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(80-47 since 1997.) (63%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more.
(40-20 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more.
(34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(46-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a double digit loss as a favorite of 6 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +16.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a upset loss as a favorite, on Wednesday nights.
(22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(82-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +40 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(99-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.9%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games.
(58-47 since 1997.) (55.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(74-53 since 1997.) (58.3%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(153-116 since 1997.) (56.9%, +33 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, on Wednesday nights.
(30-11 since 1997.) (73.2%, +32 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - good defensive team - shooting pct defense of <=40% on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +9.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(28-16 since 1997.) (63.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(40-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +9.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(19-8 since 1997.) (70.4%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(40-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(33-12 since 1997.) (73.3%, +16.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +12.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite, on Wednesday nights.
(22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +10 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| NEW YORK | 72 | | 28-68 | 40.9% | 5-13 | 35.6% | 12-15 | 76.9% | 44 | 10 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 81 | | 31-69 | 44.1% | 4-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 81.4% | 45 | 10 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 747 times, while NEW YORK won 238 times.
Edge against the money line=NEW YORK |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 25-8 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 74.0 | NEW YORK is 13-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | NEW YORK is 77-56 against the money line (+27.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 71.0 | NEW YORK is 13-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.9, OPPONENT 72.9 | NEW YORK is 12-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 78.8 | NEW YORK is 89-45 against the money line (+53.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.9 | MINNESOTA is 73-87 against the money line (-37.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.6 | MINNESOTA is 61-76 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 6-7 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | MINNESOTA is 97-100 against the money line (-46.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
NEW YORK is 30-63 against the money line (-39.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | NEW YORK is 7-14 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 83.3 | MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 71.4 | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 71.0 | MINNESOTA is 24-2 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 74.1 | MINNESOTA is 21-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 70.9 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 7-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 25-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 65.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 23-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 29-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-11 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-6 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 95-102 against the money line (-42.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-57 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 18-8 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 18-8 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 14-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 22-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-22 against the money line (+17.1 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-34 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 45-32 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 119-100 against the money line (+25.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 20-8 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 18-7 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 11-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 9-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 123-116 against the money line (+28.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 11-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 66-60 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 34-27 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.2, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 46-24 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 32-14 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-11 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 25-11 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 11-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 66.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 171-148 against the money line (+36.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 199-194 against the money line (-64.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 32-26 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-45 against the money line (-37.5 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 163-155 against the money line (-65.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-45 against the money line (-37.5 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-91 against the money line (-44.8 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 36-46 against the money line (-24.8 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 55-71 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 54-73 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-15 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 133-149 against the money line (-73.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 125-150 against the money line (-59.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 26-7 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 103-38 against the money line (+30.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-5 | +2.4 | 7-7 | 8-7 | 83.1 | 41.7 | 43.7% | 49.3 | 79.9 | 40.7 | 39.8% | 43.0 | | Road Games | 6-1 | +5 | 5-1 | 5-2 | 84.0 | 41.0 | 45.2% | 49.1 | 79.3 | 42.7 | 40.2% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.8 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 85.0 | 42.0 | 44.6% | 51.4 | 81.8 | 40.4 | 41.4% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.1 | 41.7 | 30-70 | 43.7% | 5-12 | 37.5% | 18-23 | 76.0% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 18-22 | 78.8% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.0 | 41.0 | 30-67 | 45.2% | 4-11 | 31.6% | 20-26 | 77.2% | 49 | 10 | 21 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.9 | 40.7 | 28-71 | 39.8% | 6-21 | 27.8% | 18-23 | 78.6% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.9 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 18-23 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.3 | 42.7 | 28-70 | 40.2% | 5-20 | 26.1% | 18-24 | 76.4% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 22 | 9 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-2 | +6.1 | 9-6 | 7-8 | 84.3 | 43.5 | 47.3% | 41.1 | 76.0 | 38.9 | 42.2% | 39.5 | | Home Games | 5-1 | +1.8 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 83.5 | 42.5 | 46.9% | 40.7 | 74.7 | 34.2 | 42.1% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -3.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 78.8 | 41.2 | 46.4% | 40.8 | 79.4 | 41.2 | 43.7% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.3 | 43.5 | 32-67 | 47.3% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 16-19 | 82.3% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.3 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 32.8% | 18-22 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.5 | 42.5 | 32-68 | 46.9% | 5-16 | 31.9% | 15-18 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 10 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 38.9 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-18 | 29.5% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.8 | 41.5 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 19-23 | 80.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.7 | 34.2 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-19 | 28.4% | 13-17 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 71, MINNESOTA 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/21/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-79 | L | +100 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | | 5/24/2016 | ATLANTA | 79-85 | L | -330 | 32-89 | 36.0% | 56 | 15 | 23-76 | 30.3% | 68 | 16 | | 5/31/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-79 | L | +200 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 19 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 13 | | 6/3/2016 | INDIANA | 91-59 | W | -210 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 51 | 12 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 32 | 12 | | 6/5/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 86-78 | W | -125 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 46 | 10 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 38 | 7 | | 6/7/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-100 | L | +250 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | | 6/11/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 90-75 | W | -330 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 59 | 12 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 47 | 10 | | 6/14/2016 | DALLAS | 91-88 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | | 6/16/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 80-72 | W | -330 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | | 6/19/2016 | @ INDIANA | 78-75 | W | -155 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 56 | 21 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 36 | 14 | | 6/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 90-79 | W | -140 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 61 | 18 | 28-84 | 33.3% | 46 | 11 | | 6/24/2016 | CHICAGO | 80-79 | W | -200 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 46 | 10 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 8 | | 6/26/2016 | PHOENIX | 97-104 | L | -125 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 49 | 11 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 42 | 8 | | 6/29/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/22/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 78-71 | W | -500 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | | 5/25/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 85-78 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 21 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 19 | | 5/27/2016 | INDIANA | 74-71 | W | -850 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | | 5/31/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-69 | W | -250 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 13 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 19 | | 6/4/2016 | DALLAS | 80-63 | W | -850 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | | 6/7/2016 | PHOENIX | 89-81 | W | -600 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 9 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 46 | 12 | | 6/10/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 110-78 | W | -330 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 37 | 10 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 47 | 18 | | 6/11/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 83-76 | W | -330 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 46 | 19 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 32 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | INDIANA | 87-63 | W | | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 12 | | 6/19/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 96-84 | W | -650 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | | 6/21/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | W | +135 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 76-94 | L | -220 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 38 | 18 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | | 6/26/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-87 | L | -400 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 44 | 9 | | 6/29/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 17-13 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-2 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 10-4 (+11.7 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 1-1 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/31/2016 | MINNESOTA | 79 | -6 | SU ATS | 46 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 41 | 3 | 13 | | | NEW YORK | 69 | 153.5 | Under | 31 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 41 | 6 | 19 | 9/6/2015 | NEW YORK | 75 | 145 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 41 | 10 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 71 | -3 | Over | 43 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 33 | 6 | 13 | 8/28/2015 | MINNESOTA | 68 | 147.5 | Over | 38 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 38 | 10 | 8 | | | NEW YORK | 81 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 44 | 9 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Lambeer is 10-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) on Wednesday as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 8-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 39-31 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 33-24 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 14-9 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 11-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 31-24 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 45-28 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 27-16 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 95-61 against the money line (+32.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 22-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 11-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 11-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 21-16 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 12-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 40-23 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 40-17 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 14-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.4, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 25-11 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 61-47 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 39-29 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 29-19 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 19-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 51-37 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 54-48 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in road games after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 72.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 46-40 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 67-53 against the money line (+20.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 72.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 7-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 50-35 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 24-15 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 72.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 35-28 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 19-16 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 23-14 against the money line (+13.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 19-14 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-18 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 20-13 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 16-15 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 25-25 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 37-25 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 47-41 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 7-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 67-45 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 71.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 44-37 against the money line (+20.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Lambeer is 18-34 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 24-39 against the money line (-15.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 18-33 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 160-74 against the money line (+30.8 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 135-45 against the money line (+21.4 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 82-20 against the money line (+26.1 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 86-23 against the money line (+29.0 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 86-23 against the money line (+29.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 59-17 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-21 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 101-47 against the money line (+24.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 45-21 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 54-22 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 46-22 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 15 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 129-49 against the money line (+37.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 105-39 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 65-32 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 83-42 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 111-60 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 94-43 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-62 against the money line (+20.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 86-38 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 114-55 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 45-14 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 66-23 against the money line (+27.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 34-7 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 38 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times.
Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/14/2016 - Epiphanny Prince out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/28/2024 2:41:35 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|