| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SAN ANTONIO
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
158.5
| 62
Final
89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | SAN ANTONIO | +300 | | 602 | CONNECTICUT | -400 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(271-99 since 1997.) (73.2%, +78 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(134-31 since 1997.) (81.2%, +61 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(203-73 since 1997.) (73.6%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(145-49 since 1997.) (74.7%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(127-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +54.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(150-51 since 1997.) (74.6%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(94-66 since 1997.) (58.8%, +48.5 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival.
(140-95 since 1997.) (59.6%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(240-100 since 1997.) (70.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(99-34 since 1997.) (74.4%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(93-31 since 1997.) (75%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(50-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(31-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +30.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(116-81 since 1997.) (58.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(88-54 since 1997.) (62%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-49 since 1997.) (59.8%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(39-22 since 1997.) (63.9%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(38-20 since 1997.) (65.5%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +21.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(41-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(81-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in non-conference games.
(51-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(313-310 since 1997.) (50.2%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(294-278 since 1997.) (51.4%, +54.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(145-74 since 1997.) (66.2%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(115-85 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(89-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(74-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(85-36 since 1997.) (70.2%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(31-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(63-39 since 1997.) (61.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(65-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in August or September games.
(36-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +19.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(36-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.9%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(45-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(79-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(22-11 since 1997.) (66.7%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(71-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.2%, +14.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +14.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(57-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(47-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(51-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +18.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(37-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog.
(27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +16.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(52-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(44-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(48-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +13.1 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| SAN ANTONIO | 75 | | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 43 | 11 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 81 | | 30-70 | 43.0% | 5-18 | 30.2% | 15-20 | 73.7% | 46 | 13 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 648 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 323 times.
Edge against the money line=SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 1-14 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 82.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 42-61 against the money line (-30.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 66-96 against the money line (-50.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 13-30 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 22-50 against the money line (-28.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-43 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 85.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 85-138 against the money line (-59.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 75.5 | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-7 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 9-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 73.2 | CONNECTICUT is 80-62 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.7 | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 53-27 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-6 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 89.5 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 92-106 against the money line (-39.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-121 against the money line (-43.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 134-168 against the money line (-55.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 107-155 against the money line (-49.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 159-224 against the money line (-69.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 42-64 against the money line (-31.1 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 120-160 against the money line (-54.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-3 against the money line (+14.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (+11.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-8 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after leading in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.0, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 199-281 against the money line (-83.6 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 61-105 against the money line (-51.9 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 30-51 against the money line (-30.0 Units) on Tuesday since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 73-102 against the money line (-37.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 95-161 against the money line (-71.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-44 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 73-102 against the money line (-37.9 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-136 against the money line (-53.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-69 against the money line (-30.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 59-89 against the money line (-37.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-33 against the money line (-22.0 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 33-43 against the money line (-24.7 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 74-100 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-66 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-26 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-50 against the money line (-29.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 90-127 against the money line (-43.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) against Western conference opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-15 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-12 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 54-23 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-12 against the money line (+14.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-12 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-26 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-22 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-15 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 6-19 | -0.2 | 13-12 | 12-13 | 72.9 | 34.6 | 40.7% | 40.5 | 80.4 | 39.3 | 43.7% | 43.9 | | Road Games | 2-11 | -1.2 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 74.8 | 34.3 | 41.8% | 38.7 | 83.5 | 40.1 | 44.9% | 44.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +0.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 70.4 | 35.4 | 41.8% | 39.2 | 81.0 | 34.2 | 43.8% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.9 | 34.6 | 27-66 | 40.7% | 5-15 | 30.4% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 17-21 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.8 | 34.3 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 15-18 | 79.5% | 39 | 8 | 15 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.4 | 39.3 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 18-22 | 80.7% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-16 | 34.4% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.5 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 44.9% | 6-15 | 36.5% | 19-23 | 82.1% | 44 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-17 | +3.4 | 16-9 | 13-13 | 81.3 | 39.3 | 43.0% | 43.2 | 85.2 | 40.6 | 45.9% | 43.1 | | Home Games | 4-8 | +0.3 | 6-5 | 7-5 | 81.8 | 39.7 | 42.9% | 43.7 | 85.1 | 41.2 | 45.9% | 44.1 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 83.2 | 42.6 | 42.3% | 42.0 | 83.4 | 38.6 | 45.2% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.3 | 39.3 | 31-71 | 43.0% | 5-18 | 29.6% | 15-20 | 72.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.8 | 39.7 | 31-72 | 42.9% | 5-19 | 27.4% | 15-20 | 72.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.2 | 40.6 | 30-66 | 45.9% | 5-15 | 35.1% | 19-23 | 81.5% | 43 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 34.1% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 85.1 | 41.2 | 31-67 | 45.9% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 18-23 | 79.0% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 71.2, CONNECTICUT 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | NEW YORK | 77-84 | L | +350 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 47 | 11 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 41 | 11 | | 8/28/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 85-74 | W | +350 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 46 | 15 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 44 | 10 | | 8/30/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/22/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 94-89 | W | +175 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 7 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 37 | 15 | | 8/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | 84-80 | W | +250 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 14 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 41 | 18 | | 8/28/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 73-87 | L | +145 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 15 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 51 | 14 | | 8/30/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 20-13 (+6.4 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-1 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 11-5 (+2.1 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 90 | 153.5 | ATS | 45 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 32 | 3 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -5 | SU Over | 45 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 43 | 11 | 10 | 5/19/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 41 | 10 | 11 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 68 | 151.5 | Under | 36 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 44 | 7 | 15 | 9/4/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 147 | SU ATS | 33 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 38 | 7 | 8 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | -4.5 | Under | 36 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 40 | 7 | 7 | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 51 | 150.5 | Under | 30 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 29 | 1 | 21 | | | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 50 | 12 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Hughes is 55-69 against the money line (+14.4 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after leading in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.0, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 29-31 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 20-18 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-27 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Hughes is 164-211 against the money line (-49.8 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 50-87 against the money line (-49.0 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 27-38 against the money line (-21.8 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 80-119 against the money line (-44.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 15-36 against the money line (-29.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 79-97 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 37-51 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 35-58 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 50-67 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 11-18 against the money line (-11.1 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 55-88 against the money line (-30.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 17-24 against the money line (-14.1 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 30-33 against the money line (-16.8 Units) off a road win as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 41-54 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 27-42 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 67-80 against the money line (-28.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 41-53 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-43 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 52-92 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 77-94 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 74-83 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 76-87 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 82-97 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 118-143 against the money line (-47.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 49-75 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 82-101 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 88-117 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 131-168 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 39-49 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 52-64 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 76-91 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 116-126 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 68-76 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 37-37 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 74-93 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 106-133 against the money line (-40.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 24-51 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 39-76 against the money line (-29.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 4-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-3 against the money line (+14.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 4-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 5-1 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 6-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 128 times, while the road underdog won straight up 35 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/28/2016 - Alex Montgomery "?" Tuesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Knee ) | | [G] 07/06/2016 - Kayla McBride out for season ( Foot ) | | [G] 05/14/2016 - Danielle Robinson out indefinitely ( Achilles ) | |
| [G] 07/09/2016 - Rachel Banham out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 10:22:31 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|