| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
157.5
| 77
Final
72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 651 | LOS ANGELES | -600 | | 652 | CONNECTICUT | +400 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team from last season - allowed 72 or more points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(20-12 since 1997.) (62.5%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(69-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(299-211 since 1997.) (58.6%, +80.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(170-122 since 1997.) (58.2%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(64-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(55-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 82 | | 31-63 | 49.3% | 5-14 | 34.6% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 73 | | 27-67 | 40.8% | 6-19 | 31.4% | 12-17 | 71.4% | 40 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 759 times, while CONNECTICUT won 213 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 77-31 against the money line (+31.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+15.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.8, OPPONENT 76.0 | CONNECTICUT is 2-16 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 87.8 | CONNECTICUT is 23-38 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 1-15 against the money line (-15.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 87.0 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-14.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.2 | LOS ANGELES is 68-71 against the money line (-41.3 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.6, OPPONENT 74.0 | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 16-20 against the money line (-21.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 84.1 | CONNECTICUT is 50-16 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 72.3 | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 70.0 | CONNECTICUT is 141-103 against the money line (+28.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 | CONNECTICUT is 110-90 against the money line (+26.6 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 73.4 | CONNECTICUT is 39-18 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 72.9 | CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 | CONNECTICUT is 68-45 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 72.2 |
|
| | | There are no StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents with records of significance that apply to this game. |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 44-32 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in road games when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in road games off a road win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-37 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 35-42 against the money line (-29.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-29 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 50-42 against the money line (-38.4 Units) on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 121-112 against the money line (-52.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-23 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-31 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-19 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-24 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 75-57 against the money line (+19.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-33 against the money line (+16.3 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 15-22 | -16.9 | 15-21 | 18-18 | 73.8 | 37.1 | 45.2% | 39.2 | 74.7 | 35.7 | 41.6% | 40.5 | | Road Games | 5-14 | -8.5 | 8-10 | 10-8 | 72.2 | 34.7 | 44.4% | 39.4 | 76.7 | 37.2 | 42.2% | 41.5 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 70.2 | 35.2 | 42.1% | 40.8 | 77.8 | 37.2 | 42.0% | 44.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.8 | 37.1 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 4-14 | 30.5% | 13-16 | 80.8% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.2 | 34.7 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 5-15 | 31.0% | 12-15 | 78.5% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 35.7 | 27-65 | 41.6% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 16-21 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 37.4 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.7 | 37.2 | 27-65 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 31.0% | 18-23 | 77.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 15-19 | +6.5 | 18-16 | 19-15 | 75.0 | 36.3 | 42.2% | 40.1 | 76.6 | 39.0 | 44.0% | 42.2 | | Home Games | 8-9 | -0.8 | 10-7 | 10-7 | 77.9 | 39.8 | 44.3% | 40.3 | 76.4 | 42.2 | 45.4% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.5 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 69.2 | 30.2 | 40.5% | 39.6 | 74.0 | 39.4 | 42.6% | 45.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.0 | 36.3 | 28-68 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 12-16 | 74.1% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.5 | 38 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.9 | 39.8 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 36.7% | 11-15 | 74.3% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 39.0 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 5-13 | 35.8% | 16-19 | 82.6% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.5 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.4 | 42.2 | 29-64 | 45.4% | 5-13 | 34.7% | 14-16 | 83.5% | 39 | 9 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.2, CONNECTICUT 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2016 | SEATTLE | 96-66 | W | -500 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 26 | 10 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 39 | 24 | | 5/20/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-67 | W | -330 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | | 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | W | -120 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 93-80 | W | -155 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 70-93 | L | +375 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 43 | 17 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 55 | 16 | | 5/19/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 72-68 | W | -165 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 11 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 44 | 15 | | 5/21/2016 | WASHINGTON | 76-84 | L | -250 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | | 5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 17-14 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 7-8 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 1-1 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 142 | ATS | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 44 | 8 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -7 | SU Over | 26 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 25-32 | 78.1% | 50 | 15 | 12 | 6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -4 | SU ATS | 30 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 5 | 8 | | | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 135.5 | Over | 40 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 37 | 7 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 29-18 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 29-19 against the money line (+14.7 Units) on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.2, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 78-60 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 37-24 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 20-10 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 99-72 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 62-35 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 32-16 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 48-25 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 29-13 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 20-7 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after scoring 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 22-12 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 64-43 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.2, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 55-40 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.5, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 23-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 10-15 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 25-34 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 67.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 1-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 1-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 65.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 1-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 0-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 0 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:51:08 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|