| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA CHICAGO |
|
| 165 | 82 Final 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
655 | INDIANA | -165 | 656 | CHICAGO | +145 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (181-122 since 1997.) (59.7%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +22.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (34-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (97-64 since 1997.) (60.2%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (90-56 since 1997.) (61.6%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a home loss. (58-22 since 1997.) (72.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (90-51 since 1997.) (63.8%, +29.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (42-17 since 1997.) (71.2%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%). (22-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more. (41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more. (32-11 since 1997.) (74.4%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a home loss against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more. (45-23 since 1997.) (66.2%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +22.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - cold team - having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season. (28-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games. (34-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season. (106-27 since 1997.) (79.7%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (115-37 since 1997.) (75.7%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival. (113-41 since 1997.) (73.4%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (73-13 since 1997.) (84.9%, +46.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (95-59 since 1997.) (61.7%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (75-65 since 1997.) (53.6%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games. (20-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival. (73-17 since 1997.) (81.1%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, on Wednesday nights. (32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (102-62 since 1997.) (62.2%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, on Wednesday nights. (20-6 since 1997.) (76.9%, +33.9 units. Rating = 7*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (50-15 since 1997.) (76.9%, +32.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (50-35 since 1997.) (58.8%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (74-46 since 1997.) (61.7%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (34-23 since 1997.) (59.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Wednesday nights. (37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (58-30 since 1997.) (65.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (33-4 since 1997.) (89.2%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, vs. division opponents. (30-3 since 1997.) (90.9%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (30-4 since 1997.) (88.2%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (39-12 since 1997.) (76.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (50-18 since 1997.) (73.5%, +23.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more, with a losing record. (33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (40-14 since 1997.) (74.1%, +18.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game. (27-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (25-12 since 1997.) (67.6%, +10.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an embarrassing loss by 30 points or more to a division rival, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +9.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor foul drawing team - attempting <=17 free throws/game, in June games. (39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 83 | | 30-68 | 44.8% | 5-16 | 31.1% | 17-20 | 85.3% | 40 | 11 | 12 | CHICAGO | 84 | | 32-68 | 47.5% | 4-12 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 43 | 12 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 511 times, while INDIANA won 458 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 80-41 against the money line (+38.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 74.0 | INDIANA is 17-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | INDIANA is 12-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.5 | INDIANA is 16-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | INDIANA is 22-9 against the money line (+14.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 87.0, OPPONENT 81.9 | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 88.8, OPPONENT 84.3 | CHICAGO is 106-149 against the money line (-67.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 80.2 | CHICAGO is 23-52 against the money line (-39.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 3-14 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 86.9 | CHICAGO is 49-75 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 27-50 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 13-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 90.3 | CHICAGO is 9-23 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 92.9 | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 87.0 |
|
INDIANA is 122-142 against the money line (-65.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 76.9 | INDIANA is 12-21 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.5, OPPONENT 86.6 | INDIANA is 7-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.1, OPPONENT 88.6 | INDIANA is 9-16 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.6 | CHICAGO is 58-37 against the money line (+19.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.7 | CHICAGO is 17-6 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 79.8 | CHICAGO is 124-59 against the money line (+77.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 33-12 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.9, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 12-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 147-104 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 20-17 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-12 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 20-15 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 127-96 against the money line (+32.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-10 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 10-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 29-10 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in road games versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 81-83 against the money line (-41.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-36 against the money line (-26.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 78-126 against the money line (-57.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-57 against the money line (-43.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 134-175 against the money line (-57.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-51 against the money line (-32.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-42 against the money line (-25.4 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 38-38 against the money line (-30.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 108-157 against the money line (-52.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 64-115 against the money line (-41.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-73 against the money line (-34.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 19-12 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 38-26 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 15-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 84.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 126-87 against the money line (+37.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 75-56 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 36-18 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 79.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 142-112 against the money line (+28.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 26-17 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 15-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 9-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 83.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 34-21 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 82.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-8 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-22 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) on Wednesday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 91.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 111-140 against the money line (-51.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-20 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-27 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 53-58 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-24 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-56 against the money line (-28.0 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 93-142 against the money line (-63.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 71-110 against the money line (-50.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 100-138 against the money line (-52.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 38-46 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 69-97 against the money line (-36.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-55 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 29-35 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-62 against the money line (-35.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 74-113 against the money line (-48.5 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 9 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 33-44 against the money line (-23.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) off a home loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-7 | +1.1 | 6-7 | 7-6 | 79.5 | 36.8 | 44.7% | 34.4 | 85.5 | 43.6 | 49.0% | 39.8 | Road Games | 1-5 | -4 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 72.8 | 34.3 | 41.7% | 32.0 | 87.0 | 46.5 | 51.0% | 44.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 80.4 | 38.2 | 46.7% | 35.6 | 81.0 | 41.4 | 47.1% | 39.4 | Division Games | 3-1 | +2 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 81.7 | 36.7 | 46.2% | 33.2 | 80.0 | 41.7 | 45.9% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.5 | 36.8 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 4-14 | 29.5% | 17-20 | 87.2% | 34 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 17-21 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 34.3 | 28-68 | 41.7% | 3-14 | 23.8% | 13-15 | 87.5% | 32 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.5 | 43.6 | 31-63 | 49.0% | 7-18 | 37.6% | 17-21 | 82.2% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.7 | 41.4 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 18-22 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.0 | 46.5 | 31-61 | 51.0% | 6-16 | 39.2% | 18-23 | 80.3% | 44 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-10 | -4.9 | 6-7 | 6-6 | 76.3 | 37.8 | 42.8% | 45.4 | 85.4 | 44.2 | 42.3% | 46.4 | Home Games | 0-6 | -6.4 | 0-6 | 4-2 | 77.0 | 40.8 | 41.9% | 42.8 | 92.8 | 47.5 | 45.7% | 46.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 77.4 | 37.4 | 46.5% | 44.4 | 86.6 | 45.2 | 43.9% | 42.0 | Division Games | 2-6 | -3.1 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 75.9 | 38.1 | 41.1% | 45.5 | 86.9 | 44.4 | 43.2% | 48.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 37.8 | 29-69 | 42.8% | 5-16 | 32.7% | 12-17 | 74.7% | 45 | 8 | 18 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.2 | 39.6 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 32.2% | 17-21 | 80.7% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.0 | 40.8 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-17 | 76.7% | 43 | 8 | 18 | 22 | 4 | 15 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.4 | 44.2 | 31-73 | 42.3% | 5-18 | 28.6% | 18-24 | 75.6% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 9 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 41.1 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 31.7% | 17-22 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 92.8 | 47.5 | 34-75 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 18-22 | 80.5% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 71.9, CHICAGO 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 81-79 | W | -270 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 29 | 9 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 39 | 18 | 5/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 93-90 | W | +210 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 35 | 8 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 33 | 9 | 5/28/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 70-94 | L | +210 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 26 | 17 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 31 | 16 | 5/30/2017 | @ DALLAS | 62-89 | L | +175 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 35 | 17 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 48 | 12 | 6/3/2017 | DALLAS | 91-85 | W | -175 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 40 | 10 | 6/7/2017 | PHOENIX | 90-98 | L | +175 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 21 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 37 | 14 | 6/9/2017 | SEATTLE | 83-80 | W | +200 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 8 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 30 | 10 | 6/11/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 70-88 | L | +280 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 31 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 52 | 10 | 6/15/2017 | ATLANTA | 85-74 | W | -175 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 13 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 38 | 8 | 6/18/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 91-79 | W | -115 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 33 | 4 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 18 | 6/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 73-84 | L | +200 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 12 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 37 | 14 | 6/28/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 83-91 | L | +100 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 39 | 12 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 47 | 15 | 5/21/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 75-71 | W | +200 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 54 | 15 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 49 | 11 | 5/24/2017 | WASHINGTON | 67-82 | L | +180 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 10 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 48 | 7 | 5/26/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-88 | L | +280 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 15 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 9 | 5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 79-97 | L | -140 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 11 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 69 | 7 | 6/1/2017 | PHOENIX | 91-99 | L | +175 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 35 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 11 | 6/6/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 70-79 | L | +650 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 18 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 44 | 7 | 6/10/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-81 | W | +120 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 41 | 20 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 44 | 12 | 6/16/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | L | +350 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 49 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 9 | 6/18/2017 | INDIANA | 79-91 | L | -105 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 18 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 33 | 4 | 6/23/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 82-78 | W | +135 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 48 | 10 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 6 | 6/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | 63-97 | L | +180 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 21 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 45 | 9 | 6/28/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 38-16 (+17.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 5-6 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 17-10 (+12.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 3-3 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/18/2017 | INDIANA | 91 | -1 | SU ATS | 39 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 14-14 | 100.0% | 33 | 8 | 4 | | CHICAGO | 79 | 164 | Over | 43 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 40 | 2 | 18 | 9/9/2016 | CHICAGO | 88 | 167 | | 44 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 40 | 12 | 11 | | INDIANA | 95 | -7 | SU Over | 52 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 27-36 | 75.0% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 6/29/2016 | INDIANA | 95 | 166.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 41 | 11 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 83 | -6 | Over | 38 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 32 | 6 | 14 | 6/10/2016 | CHICAGO | 73 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 4-4 | 100.0% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | INDIANA | 64 | 172 | Under | 33 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 4-24 | 16.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 41 | 12 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 26-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 82.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 14-35 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 74.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 74-83 against the money line (-35.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 78.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 25-45 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 75.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 7-23 against the money line (-18.2 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 74.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 19-35 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 75.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 20-32 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 74.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 24-45 against the money line (-26.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 17-35 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 75.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-28 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 26-43 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-28 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-53 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 78.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 7-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 26-33 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 79.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 47-63 against the money line (-36.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 37 times, while the home underdog won straight up 22 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the home underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 05/28/2017 - Jamierra Faulkner out for season ( ACL ) | [C] 05/21/2017 - Alaina Coates out indefinitely ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/5/2024 10:26:34 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|