|
|
INDIANAPOLIS CINCINNATI |
|
| 37.5 | 13 Final 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
113 | INDIANAPOLIS | 39 | 38 | 114 | CINCINNATI | -3.5 | -4 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -1.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 318.0 | (5.6) | 0.7 | 23.3 | 13.3 | 337.0 | (5.4) | 0.7 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1.2 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 19.0 | 9.0 | 274.0 | (5) | 0.0 | 18.0 | 9.0 | 372.0 | (5.3) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 318.0 | (5.6) | 0.7 | 23.3 | 13.3 | 337.0 | (5.4) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1.2 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 19.0 | 9.0 | 274.0 | (5) | 0.0 | 18.0 | 9.0 | 372.0 | (5.3) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.0 | 6.0 | 18.7 | 28:60 | 21-54 | (2.5) | 23-36 | 65.4% | 264 | (7.4) | 57-318 | (5.6) | (15.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 13.1 | 7.1 | 16.2 | 28:41 | 22-70 | (3.1) | 20-35 | 57.6% | 208 | (5.9) | 57-278 | (4.8) | (21.2) | Offense Road Games | 19.0 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 25:39 | 23-30 | (1.3) | 17-32 | 53.1% | 244 | (7.6) | 55-274 | (5) | (14.4) | Defense (All Games) | 23.3 | 13.3 | 19.3 | 31:00 | 27-125 | (4.6) | 22-35 | 64.4% | 212 | (6.1) | 62-337 | (5.4) | (14.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.4 | 14.2 | 19.3 | 32:19 | 30-114 | (3.8) | 22-36 | 61.9% | 203 | (5.7) | 66-317 | (4.8) | (14.8) | Defense Road Games | 18.0 | 9.0 | 21.0 | 34:21 | 28-126 | (4.5) | 23-42 | 54.8% | 246 | (5.9) | 70-372 | (5.3) | (20.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -1.1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 22.3 | 13.7 | 293.7 | (4.8) | 1.0 | 19.0 | 6.3 | 288.7 | (4.9) | 1.3 | Home Games | 0-1 | -1.2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 339.0 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 274.0 | (5.3) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 22.3 | 13.7 | 293.7 | (4.8) | 1.0 | 19.0 | 6.3 | 288.7 | (4.9) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 0-1 | -1.2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 339.0 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 274.0 | (5.3) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 22.3 | 13.7 | 18.3 | 31:08 | 29-90 | (3.2) | 19-32 | 60.4% | 203 | (6.4) | 61-294 | (4.8) | (13.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 19.9 | 12.9 | 19.4 | 31:43 | 29-110 | (3.8) | 19-33 | 56.3% | 190 | (5.7) | 62-301 | (4.8) | (15.1) | Offense Home Games | 16.0 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 31:29 | 28-90 | (3.2) | 21-36 | 58.3% | 249 | (6.9) | 64-339 | (5.3) | (21.2) | Defense (All Games) | 19.0 | 6.3 | 16.3 | 28:52 | 27-82 | (3.1) | 20-32 | 62.9% | 207 | (6.4) | 59-289 | (4.9) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19 | 9.8 | 16.7 | 29:17 | 25-90 | (3.5) | 20-33 | 60.1% | 208 | (6.3) | 58-298 | (5.1) | (15.7) | Defense Home Games | 17.0 | 10.0 | 16.0 | 28:31 | 25-56 | (2.2) | 20-27 | 74.1% | 218 | (8.1) | 52-274 | (5.3) | (16.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANAPOLIS 21.7, CINCINNATI 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/13/2016 | @ BUFFALO | 19-18 | W | 2.5 | W | 36 | O | 23-30 | 17-32-244 | 0 | 28-126 | 23-42-246 | 0 | 8/20/2016 | BALTIMORE | 18-19 | L | -2 | L | 39.5 | U | 23-93 | 28-37-233 | 1 | 30-120 | 18-30-131 | 1 | 8/27/2016 | PHILADELPHIA | 23-33 | L | -1 | L | 44 | O | 18-39 | 25-38-315 | 1 | 24-130 | 26-32-258 | 1 | 9/1/2016 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/12/2016 | MINNESOTA | 16-17 | L | -1 | L | 35 | U | 28-90 | 21-36-249 | 2 | 25-56 | 20-27-218 | 1 | 8/18/2016 | @ DETROIT | 30-14 | W | 1.5 | W | 41.5 | O | 29-102 | 21-29-189 | 0 | 27-73 | 24-36-276 | 2 | 8/28/2016 | @ JACKSONVILLE | 21-26 | L | 2.5 | L | 42.5 | O | 29-79 | 16-31-172 | 1 | 28-116 | 17-34-127 | 1 | 9/1/2016 | INDIANAPOLIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| INDIANAPOLIS: The Colts' main objective will be to keep QB Andrew Luck upright and healthy. First-round pick C Ryan Kelly will start immediately, and half of the two-deep o-line depth chart could be rookies. That doesn't necessarily bode well for Luck, who spent most of last season dealing with a lacerated spleen. The Colts could also really use a bounceback year from RB Frank Gore. Indianapolis fired defensive coordinator Greg Manusky in January and hired Ted Monachino, who had been the Ravens' linebackers coach since 2010, to replace him. | | CINCINNATI: The Bengals' season ended in ugly fashion against Pittsburgh in the playoffs last year. They will, however, have a healthy QB Andy Dalton back under center and this team may have had a very different ending to the season if he didn't get hurt last year. The addition of LB Karlos Dansby is expected to provide maturity and veteran leadership to a fiery defense that desperately needed it. The offense will need to overcome the loss of coordinator Hue Jackson, who left to become Cleveland's head coach. The expectation is that Cincinnati will not be changing much on that side of the field. |
|
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 5:05:57 PM EST. |
|
|